arXiv++ Combinatorics

Laman graphs model planar frameworks which are rigid for a general choice of distances between the vertices. There are finitely many ways, up to isometries, to realize a Laman graph in the plane. In a recent paper we provide a recursion formula for this number of realizations using ideas from algebraic and tropical geometry. Here, we present a concise summary of this result focusing on the main ideas and the combinatorial point of view.

Laman graphs model planar frameworks that are rigid for a general choice of distances between the vertices. There are finitely many ways, up to isometries, to realize a Laman graph in the plane. Such realizations can be seen as solutions of systems of quadratic equations prescribing the distances between pairs of points. Using ideas from algebraic and tropical geometry, we provide a recursive formula for the number of complex solutions of such systems.

An ordinary circle of a set $P$ of $n$ points in the plane is defined as a circle that contains exactly three points of $P$. We show that if $P$ is not contained in a line or a circle, then $P$ spans at least $\frac{1}{4}n^2 - O(n)$ ordinary circles. Moreover, we determine the exact minimum number of ordinary circles for all sufficiently large $n$ and describe all point sets that come close to this minimum. We also consider the circle variant of the orchard problem. We prove that $P$ spans at most $\frac{1}{24}n^3 - O(n^2)$ circles passing through exactly four points of $P$. Here we determine the exact maximum and the extremal configurations for all sufficiently large $n$. These results are based on the following structure theorem. If $n$ is sufficiently large depending on $K$, and $P$ is a set of $n$ points spanning at most $Kn^2$ ordinary circles, then all but $O(K)$ points of $P$ lie on an algebraic curve of degree at most four. Our proofs rely on a recent result of Green and Tao on ordinary lines, combined with circular inversion and some classical results regarding algebraic curves.

We generalize an inequality for convex lattice polygons -- aka toric surfaces -- to general rational surfaces.

First we solve the problem of finding minimal degree families on toric surfaces by reducing it to lattice geometry. Then we describe how to find minimal degree families on, more generally, rational complex projective surfaces.

We propose a combinatorial game on finite graphs, called Salmagundy, that is played by two protagonists, Dido and Mephisto. The game captures the logical structure of a proof of the resolution of singularities. In each round, the graph of the game is modified by the moves of the players. When it assumes a final configuration, Dido has won. Otherwise, the game goes on forever, and nobody wins. In particular, Mephisto cannot win himself, he can only prevent Dido from winning. We show that Dido always possesses a winning strategy, regardless of the initial shape of the graph and of the moves of Mephisto. This implies -- translating back to algebraic geometry -- that there is a choice of centers for the blowup of singular varieties in characteristic zero which eventually leads to their resolution. The algebra needed for this implication is elementary. The transcription from varieties to graphs and from blowups to modifications of the graph thus axiomatizes the proof of the resolution of singularities. In principle, the same logic could also work in positive characteristic, once an appropriate descent in dimension is settled.

In this note we classify all triples (a,b,i) such that there is a convex lattice polygon P with area a, and b respectively i lattice points on the boundary respectively in the interior. The crucial lemma for the classification is the necessity of b \le 2 i + 7. We sketch three proofs of this fact: the original one by Scott, an elementary one, and one using algebraic geometry. As a refinement, we introduce an onion skin parameter l: how many nested polygons does P contain? and give sharper bounds.