arXiv++ Combinatorics

A coloring of the vertex set of a graph using the colors red and blue is a closed neighborhood balanced coloring if for each vertex there are an equal number of red and blue vertices in its closed neighborhood. A graph with such a coloring is called a CNBC graph. Freyberg and Marr studied the related class of NBC graphs where closed neighborhood is replaced by open neighborhood. We prove results about CNBC graphs and NBC graphs. We show that the class of CNBC graphs is not hereditary, that the sizes of the color classes can be arbitrarily different, and that if the sizes of the color classes are equal, then a graph is a CNBC graph if and only if its complement is an NBC graph. When the sizes of the color classes are equal, we show that the join of two CNBC graphs is a CNBC graph, and the lexicographic product of a CNBC graph with any graph is a CNBC graph. We prove that the Cartesian product of any CNBC graph and any NBC graph is a CNBC graph, and characterize when a hypercube is an NBC graph or a CNBC graph, but show that the product of two CNBC graphs need not be an NBC graph. We show that the strong product of a CNBC graph with any graph is a CNBC graph. We construct infinite families of circulants that are CNBC graphs, and give characterizations of CNBC trees, generalized Petersen graphs, cubic circulants and quintic circulants when $n\equiv 2 \pmod 4$.

We study a discrete-time model for the spread of information in a graph, motivated by the idea that people believe a story when they learn of it from two different origins. Similar to the burning number, in this problem, information spreads in rounds and a new source can appear in each round. For a graph $G$, we are interested in $b_2(G)$, the minimum number of rounds until the information has spread to all vertices of graph $G$. We are also interested in finding $t_2(G)$, the minimum number of sources necessary so that the information spreads to all vertices of $G$ in $b_2(G)$ rounds. In addition to general results, we find $b_2(G)$ and $t_2(G)$ for the classes of spiders and wheels and show that their behavior differs with respect to these two parameters. We also provide examples and prove upper bounds for these parameters for Cartesian products of graphs.

We introduce the discrete-time treatment number of a graph, in which each vertex is in exactly one of three states at any given time-step: compromised, vulnerable, or treated. Our treatment number is distinct from other graph searching parameters that use only two states, such as the firefighter problem or Bernshteyn and Lee's inspection number. Vertices represent individuals and edges exist between individuals with close connections. Each vertex starts out as compromised; it can become compromised again even after treatment. Our objective is to treat the entire population so that at the last time-step, no members are vulnerable or compromised, while minimizing the maximum number of treatments that occur at each time-step. This minimum is the treatment number, and it depends on the choice of a pre-determined length of time $r$ that a vertex can remain in a treated state and length of time $s$ that a vertex can remain in a vulnerable state without being treated again. We denote the pathwidth of graph $H$ by $pw(H)$ and prove that the treatment number of $H$ is bounded above by $\lceil \frac{1+pw(H)}{r+s}\rceil$. This equals the best possible lower bound for a cautious treatment plan, defined as one in which each vertex, after being treated for the first time, is treated again within every consecutive $r+s$ time-steps until its last treatment. However, many graphs admit a plan that is not cautious. When $r=s=1$, we find a useful tool for proving lower bounds, show that the treatment number of an $n\times n$ grid equals $\lceil\frac{1+n}{2}\rceil$, characterize graphs that require only one treatment per time-step, and prove that subdividing one edge can reduce the treatment number. It is known that there are trees with arbitrarily large pathwidth; surprisingly, we prove that for any tree $T$, there is a subdivision of $T$ that requires at most two treatments per time-step.