arXiv++ Combinatorics

An independent set in a graph $G$ is a set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices. A tree decomposition of $G$ is a pair $(T, χ)$ where $T$ is a tree and $χ: V(T) \rightarrow 2^{V(G)}$ is a function satisfying two axioms: for every edge $uv \in E(G)$ there is an $x \in V(T)$ such that $\{u,v\} \subseteq χ(x)$, and for every vertex $u \in V(G)$ the set $\{x \in V(T) | u \in χ(x)\}$ induces a non-empty and connected subtree of $T$. The sets $χ(x)$ for $x \in V(T)$ are called the bags of the tree decomposition. The tree-independence number of $G$ is the minimum taken over all tree decompositions of $G$ of the maximum size of an independent set of the graph induced by a bag of the decomposition. A graph $H$ is an induced minor of a graph $G$ if a graph isomorphic to $H$ can be obtained from $G$ by vertex deletions and edge contractions. We prove that for every $t\in\mathbb{N}$ there exists an $ε> 0$ such that every graph $G$ either contains the complete bipartite graph $K_{t,t}$ or the wall $W_{t\times t}$ as an induced minor, or has tree-independence at most $O(2^{O((\log n)^{1-ε})})$. This leads to algorithms with running time $2^{n^{o(1)}}$, for a wide range of problems on $\{K_{t,t}, W_{t\times t}\}$-induced minor free graphs. Our result is a substantial generalization of existing bounds for the tree-independence and tree-width on various graph classes, and a partial resolution of the conjecture of Chudnovsky, E S, and Lokshtanov [Arxiv, 2025] that $\{K_{t,t}, W_{t\times t}\}$-induced minor free graphs have poly-logarithmic tree independence number. The generality comes at the cost of a sub-polynomial, rather than poly-logarithmic upper bound. Our result leads to a complete classification of induced-minor closed classes into ones that have sub-polynomial tree-independence, tree-independence equal to $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$, and linear tree-independence.

Let $G$ be a graph, $S \subseteq V(G)$ be a vertex set in $G$ and $r$ be a positive integer. The distance $r$-independence number of $S$ is the size of the largest subset $I \subseteq S$ such that no pair $u$, $v$ of vertices in $I$ have a path on at most $r$ edges between them in $G$. It has been conjectured [Chudnovsky et al., arXiv, 2025] that for every positive integer $t$ there exist positive integers $c$, $d$ such that every graph $G$ that excludes both the complete bipartite graph $K_{t,t}$ and the grid $\boxplus_t$ as an induced minor has a tree decomposition in which every bag has (distance $1$) independence number at most $c(\log n)^d$. We prove a weaker version of this conjecture where every bag of the tree decomposition has distance $16(\log n + 1)$-independence number at most $c(\log n)^d$. On the way we also prove a version of the conjecture where every bag of the decomposition has distance $8$-independence number at most $2^{c (\log n)^{1-(1/d)}}$.

An {\em independent set} in a graph $G$ is a set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices. A {\em tree decomposition} of $G$ is a pair $(T, χ)$ where $T$ is a tree and $χ: V(T) \rightarrow 2^{V(G)}$ is a function satisfying the following two axioms: for every edge $uv \in V(G)$ there is a $x \in V(T)$ such that $\{u,v\} \subseteq χ(x)$, and for every vertex $u \in V(G)$ the set $\{x \in V(T) ~:~ u \in χ(X)\}$ induces a non-empty and connected subtree of $T$. The sets $χ(x)$ for $x \in V(T)$ are called the {\em bags} of the tree decomposition. The {\em tree-independence} number of $G$ is the minimum taken over all tree decompositions of $G$ of the size of the maximum independent set of the graph induced by a bag of the tree decomposition. The study of graph classes with bounded tree-independence number has attracted much attention in recent years, in part due its improtant algorithmic implications. A conjecture of Dallard, Milanič and Storgel, connecting tree-independence number to the classical notion of treewidth, was one of the motivating problems in the area. This conjecture was recently disproved, but here we prove a slight variant of it, that retains much of the algorithmic significance. As part of the proof we introduce the notion of {\em independence-containers}, which can be viewed as a generalization of the set of all maximal cliques of a graph, and is of independent interest.