arXiv++ Combinatorics

A box in Euclidean $k$-space is the Cartesian product of $k$ closed intervals on the real line. The boxicity of a graph $G$, denoted by $\text{box}(G)$, is the minimum nonnegative integer $k$ such that $G$ can be isomorphic to the intersection graph of a family of boxes in Euclidean $k$-space. In this paper, we present a sufficient condition for a graph $G$ under which $\text{box}(G)\leq χ(G)$ holds, where $χ(G)$ denotes the chromatic number of $G$. Bhowmick and Chandran (2010) proved that $\text{box}(G)\leq χ(G)$ holds for a graph $G$ with no asteroidal triples. We prove that $\text{box}(G)\leq χ(G)$ holds for a graph $G$ in a special family of circulant graphs with an asteroidal triple.

The boxicity of a graph $G$ is the minimum non-negative integer $k$ such that $G$ can be isomorphic to the intersection graph of a family of boxes in Euclidean $k$-space, where a box in Euclidean $k$-space is the Cartesian product of $k$ closed intervals on the real line. In this note, we define the fractional boxicity of a graph as the optimum value of the linear relaxation of a covering problem with respect to boxicity, which gives a lower bound for its boxicity. We show that the fractional boxicity of a graph is at least the lower bounds for boxicity given by Adiga et al. in 2014. We also present a natural lower bound for fractional boxicity of graphs. Moreover we discuss and focus on "accuracy" rather than "simplicity" of these lower bounds for boxicity as the next step in Adiga's work.

A box in Euclidean $k$-space is the Cartesian product $I_1\times I_2\times \cdots \times I_k$, where $I_j$ is a closed interval on the real line. The boxicity of a graph $G$, denoted by $\text{box}(G)$, is the minimum nonnegative integer $k$ such that $G$ can be isomorphic to the intersection graph of a family of boxes in Euclidean $k$-space. Mycielski introduced an interesting graph operation that extends a graph $G$ to a new graph $M(G)$, called the Mycielski graph of $G$. In this paper, we observe behavior of the boxicity of Mycielski graphs. The inequality $\text{box}(M(G))\geq \text{box}(G)$ holds for a graph $G$, and hence we are interested in whether the boxicity of the Mycielski graph of $G$ is more than that of $G$ or not. Here we give bounds for the boxicity of Mycielski graphs: for a graph $G$ with $l$ universal vertices, the inequalities $\text{box}(G)+\left \lceil \frac{l}{2}\right \rceil \leq \text{box}(M(G))\leq θ(\overline{G})+\left\lceil \frac{l}{2}\right\rceil +1$ hold, where $θ(\overline{G})$ is the edge clique cover number of the complement $\overline{G}$. Further observations determine the boxicity of the Mycielski graph $M(G)$, if $G$ has no universal vertices or odd universal vertices and satisfies $\text{box}(G)=θ(\overline{G})$. We also present relations between the Mycielski graph $M(G)$ and its analogous ones $M_3(G)$ and $M_r(G)$ in the context of boxicity, which will encourage us to calculate the boxicity of $M(G)$ or $M_3(G)$.