arXiv++ Combinatorics

Recently, a new vector encoding, Ordered Leaf Attachment (OLA), was introduced that represents $n$-leaf phylogenetic trees as $n-1$ length integer vectors by recording the placement location of each leaf. Both encoding and decoding of trees run in linear time and depend on a fixed ordering of the leaves. Here, we investigate the connection between OLA vectors and the maximum acyclic agreement forest (MAAF) problem. A MAAF represents an optimal breakdown of $k$ trees into reticulation-free subtrees, with the roots of these subtrees representing reticulation events. We introduce a corrected OLA distance index over OLA vectors of $k$ trees, which is easily computable in linear time. We prove that the corrected OLA distance corresponds to the size of a MAAF, given an optimal leaf ordering that minimizes that distance. Additionally, a MAAF can be easily reconstructed from optimal OLA vectors. We expand these results to multifurcated trees: we introduce an $O(kn \cdot m\log m)$ algorithm that optimally resolves a set of multifurcated trees given a leaf-ordering, where $m$ is the size of a largest multifurcation, and show that trees resolved via this algorithm also minimize the size of a MAAF. These results suggest a new approach to fast computation of phylogenetic networks and identification of reticulation events via random permutations of leaves. Additionally, in the case of microbial evolution, a natural ordering of leaves is often given by the sample collection date, which means that under mild assumptions, reticulation events can be identified in polynomial time on such datasets.

Phylogenetic networks are directed acyclic graphs that depict the genomic evolution of related taxa. Reticulation nodes in such networks (nodes with more than one parent) represent reticulate evolutionary events, such as recombination, reassortment, hybridization, or horizontal gene transfer. Typically, the complexity of a phylogenetic network is expressed in terms of its level, i.e., the maximum number of edges that are required to be removed from each biconnected component of the phylogenetic network to turn it into a tree. Here, we study the relationship between the level of a phylogenetic network and another popular graph complexity parameter - treewidth. We show a $\frac{k+3}{2}$ upper bound on the treewidth of level-$k$ phylogenetic networks and an improved $(1/3 + δ) k$ upper bound for large $k$. These bounds imply that many computational problems on phylogenetic networks, such as the small parsimony problem or some variants of phylogenetic diversity maximization, are polynomial-time solvable on level-$k$ networks with constant $k$. Our first bound is applicable to any $k$, and it allows us to construct an explicit tree decomposition of width $\frac{k+3}{2}$ that can be used to analyze phylogenetic networks generated by tools like SNAQ that guarantee bounded network level. Finally, we show a $k/13$ lower bound on the maximum treewidth among level-$k$ phylogenetic networks for large enough $k$ based on expander graphs.

Given two phylogenetic trees with the $\{1, \ldots, n\}$ leaf-set the maximum agreement subtree problem asks what is the maximum size of the subset $A \subseteq \{1, \ldots, n\}$ such that the two trees are equivalent when restricted to $A$. The long-standing extremal version of this problem focuses on the smallest number of leaves, $\mathrm{mast}(n)$, on which any two (binary and unrooted) phylogenetic trees with $n$ leaves must agree. In this work we prove that this number grows asymptotically as $Θ(\log n)$; thus closing the enduring gap between the lower and upper asymptotic bounds on $\mathrm{mast}(n)$.