arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $Γ$ be a function that maps two arbitrary graphs $G$ and $H$ to a non-negative real number such that $$α(G^{\boxtimes n})\leq α(H^{\boxtimes n})Γ(G,H)^n$$ where $n$ is any natural number and $G^{\boxtimes n}$ is the strong product of $G$ with itself $n$ times. We establish the equivalence of two different approaches for finding such a function $Γ$. The common solution obtained through either approach is termed ``the relative fractional independence number of a graph $G$ with respect to another graph $H$". We show this function by $α^*(G|H)$ and discuss some of its properties. In particular, we show that $α^*(G|H)\geq \frac{X(G)}{X(H)} \geq \frac{1}{α^*(H|G)},$ where $X(G)$ can be the independence number, the Shannon capacity, the fractional independence number, the Lovász number, or the Schrijver's or Szegedy's variants of the Lovász number of a graph $G$. This inequality is the first explicit non-trivial upper bound on the ratio of the invariants of two arbitrary graphs, as mentioned earlier, which can also be used to obtain upper or lower bounds for these invariants. As explicit applications, we present new upper bounds for the ratio of the Shannon capacity of two Cayley graphs and compute new lower bounds on the Shannon capacity of certain Johnson graphs (yielding the exact value of their Haemers number). Moreover, we show that $α^*(G|H)$ can be used to present a stronger version of the well-known No-Homomorphism Lemma.

We introduce a new variant of variable-length source coding for sending a source over two parallel channels, one of which is costly and the other free. We give a complete solution to this problem. Next, we relate the problem to the number partitioning problem, which is the task of dividing a given list of numbers into a pre-specified number of subsets such that the sum of the numbers in each subset is as nearly equal as possible. We introduce two new objective functions for this problem and show that an adapted version of the Huffman coding algorithm (with a runtime of $\mathcal{O}(n \log n)$ for input size $n$) produces the optimal solution for one objective function, and a nearly optimal solution for the other objective function.