arXiv++ Combinatorics

We solve the following problem: Can an undirected weighted graph G be parti- tioned into two non-empty induced subgraphs satisfying minimum constraints for the sum of edge weights at vertices of each subgraph? We show that this is possible for all constraints a(x), b(x) satisfying d_G(x) >= a(x) + b(x) + 2W_G(x), for every vertex x, where d_G(x), W_G(x) are, respectively, the sum and maximum of incident edge weights.

An internal partition of an $n$-vertex graph $G=(V,E)$ is a partition of $V$ such that every vertex has at least as many neighbors in its own part as in the other part. It has been conjectured that every $d$-regular graph with $n>N(d)$ vertices has an internal partition. Here we prove this for $d=6$. The case $d=n-4$ is of particular interest and leads to interesting new open problems on cubic graphs. We also provide new lower bounds on $N(d)$ and find new families of graphs with no internal partitions. Weighted versions of these problems are considered as well.

We consider the following solitaire game whose rules are reminiscent of the children's game of leapfrog. The player is handed an arbitrary ordering $π=(x_1,x_2,...,x_n)$ of the elements of a finite poset $(P,\prec)$. At each round an element may "skip over" the element in front of it, i.e. swap positions with it. For example, if $x_i \prec x_{i+1}$, then it is allowed to move from $π$ to the ordering $(x_1,x_2,...,x_{i-1},x_{i+1},x_i,x_{i+2},...,x_n)$. The player is to carry out such steps as long as such swaps are possible. When there are several consecutive pairs of elements that satisfy this condition, the player can choose which pair to swap next. Does the order of swaps matter for the final ordering or is it uniquely determined by the initial ordering? The reader may guess correctly that the latter proposition is correct. What may be more surprising, perhaps, is that this question is not trivial. The proof works by constructing an appropriate system of invariants.