arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a graph $H$, we say that a graph $G$ is properly rainbow $H$-saturated if: (1) There is a proper edge colouring of $G$ containing no rainbow copy of $H$; (2) For every $e \notin E(G)$, every proper edge colouring of $G+e$ contains a rainbow copy of $H$. The proper rainbow saturation number $\text{sat}^*(n,H)$ is the minimum number of edges in a properly rainbow $H$-saturated graph. In this paper we initiate a systematic study of the proper rainbow saturation number for trees. We obtain exact and asymptotic results on $\text{sat}^*(n,T)$ for several infinite families of trees. Our proofs reveal connections to the classical saturation and semi-saturation numbers.

Given a graph $H$, we say that a graph $G$ is properly rainbow $H$-saturated if: (1) There is a proper edge colouring of $G$ containing no rainbow copy of $H$; (2) For every $e \notin E(G)$, every proper edge colouring of $G+e$ contains a rainbow copy of $H$. The proper rainbow saturation number $\text{sat}^*(n,H)$ is the minimum number of edges in a properly rainbow $H$-saturated graph. In this paper we use connections to the classical saturation and semi-saturation numbers to provide new upper bounds on $\text{sat}^*(n,H)$ for general cliques, cycles, and complete bipartite graphs. We also provide some general lower bounds on $\text{sat}^*(n,H)$ and explore several other interesting directions.

Given graphs $G, H$ and an integer $q \ge 2$, the generalized Ramsey number, denoted $r(G,H,q)$, is the minimum number of colours needed to edge-colour $G$ such that every copy of $H$ receives at least $q$ colours. In this paper, we prove that for a fixed integer $k \ge 3$, we have $r(K_n,C_k,3) = n/(k-2)+o(n)$. This generalises work of Joos and Muybayi, who proved $r(K_n,C_4,3) = n/2+o(n)$. We also provide an upper bound on $r(K_{n,n}, C_k, 3)$, which generalises a result of Joos and Mubayi that $r(K_{n,n},C_4,3) = 2n/3+o(n)$. Both of our results are in fact specific cases of more general theorems concerning families of cycles.