arXiv++ Combinatorics

This paper studies logical aspects of the notion of better quasi order, which has been introduced by C. Nash-Williams (Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1965 & 1968). A central tool in the theory of better quasi orders is the minimal bad array lemma. We show that this lemma is exceptionally strong from the viewpoint of reverse mathematics, a framework from mathematical logic. Specifically, it is equivalent to the set existence principle of $Π^1_2$-comprehension, over the base theory $\mathsf{ATR_0}$.

The notion of better quasi order ($\mathsf{BQO}$), due to Nash-Williams, is very fruitful mathematically and intriguing from the standpoint of logic, due to several long-standing open problems. In the present paper, we make a significant step towards one of these: Let $\mathbf 3$ be the discrete order with three elements. We show that arithmetical recursion along the natural numbers ($\mathsf{ACA}_0^+$) follows from $\mathbf 3$ being $\mathsf{BQO}$, over the base theory $\mathsf{RCA_0}$ from reverse mathematics. Also over the latter, we deduce arithmetical transfinite recursion ($\mathsf{ATR}_0$) from the assumption that $\mathbf 3$ is $Δ^0_2\text{-}\mathsf{BQO}$, which plays a role in work of Montalbán.

We prove that Higman's lemma is strictly stronger for better quasi orders than for well quasi orders, within the framework of reverse mathematics. In fact, we show a stronger result: the infinite Ramsey theorem (for tuples of all lengths) follows from the statement that any array $[\mathbb N]^{n+1}\to\mathbb N^n\times X$ for a well order $X$ and $n\in\mathbb N$ is good, over the base theory $\mathsf{RCA_0}$.

Harvey Friedman's gap condition on embeddings of finite labelled trees plays an important role in combinatorics (proof of the graph minor theorem) and mathematical logic (strong independence results). In the present paper we show that the gap condition can be reconstructed from a small number of well-motivated building blocks: it arises via iterated applications of a uniform Kruskal theorem.

The minimal bad sequence argument due to Nash-Williams is a powerful tool in combinatorics with important implications for theoretical computer science. In particular, it yields a very elegant proof of Kruskal's theorem. At the same time, it is known that Kruskal's theorem does not require the full strength of the minimal bad sequence argument. This claim can be made precise in the framework of reverse mathematics, where the existence of minimal bad sequences is equivalent to a principle known as $Π^1_1$-comprehension, which is much stronger than Kruskal's theorem. In the present paper we give a uniform version of Kruskal's theorem by relativizing it to certain transformations of well partial orders. We show that $Π^1_1$-comprehension is equivalent to our uniform Kruskal theorem (over $\mathbf{RCA}_0$ together with the chain-antichain principle). This means that any proof of the uniform Kruskal theorem must entail the existence of minimal bad sequences. As a by-product of our investigation, we obtain uniform proofs of several Kruskal-type independence results.