arXiv++ Combinatorics

We investigate the relationship between finite groups and incidence geometries through their automorphism structures. Building upon classical results on the realizability of groups as automorphism groups of graphs, we develop a general framework to represent pairs of finite groups $(G, H)$, where $H \trianglelefteq G$, as pairs of correlation--automorphism groups of suitable incidence geometries. Specifically, we prove that for every such pair $(G, H)$, there exists a finite incidence geometry $Γ$ satisfying that the pair $(\operatorname{Aut}(Γ), \operatorname{Aut}_I(Γ))$ of correlation--automorphism groups of $Γ$ is isomorphic to $(G, H)$. Our construction proceeds in two main steps: first, we realize $(G, H)$ as the correlation and automorphism groups of an incidence system; then, we refine this system into a genuine incidence geometry preserving the same pair of automorphisms groups. We also provide explicit examples, including a family of geometries realizing $(S_n, A_n)$ for all $n \ge 2$.

Shellable complexes are homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres of possibly different dimensions, so that the (co)homology of the constant functor over the complex is concentrated in those degrees. In this work, we introduce the concept of a stable functor -- a local weakening of fibrancy -- over a shellable poset, which ensures the vanishing of the (co)homology of such a functor in specific degrees. The methods are based on a model category structure on the category of functors indexed by a filtered poset and the combinatorial structure of shellable posets. Our techniques work over non-finite and non-pure posets and employ a description of (co)homology via explicit fibrant replacements. Applications include acyclicity criteria for Mackey functors, computation of cohomology of $j$-th exterior powers over arrangement lattices, and homological decompositions for Bianchi groups $Γ_d$ for $d=1,2,7$ and $11$.

We propose some conditions on a poset that produce a small chain complex for its homology. This allows to compare simplicial complexes and Quillen's complexes under the same prism. It turns out they differ in the existence or not of free faces in an acyclic complex.