arXiv++ Combinatorics

The vector-balancing problem is a fundamental problem in discrepancy theory: given T vectors in $[-1,1]^n$, find a signing $σ(a) \in \{\pm 1\}$ of each vector $a$ to minimize the discrepancy $\| \sum_{a} σ(a) \cdot a \|_{\infty}$. This problem has been extensively studied in the static/offline setting. In this paper we initiate its study in the fully-dynamic setting with recourse: the algorithm sees a stream of T insertions and deletions of vectors, and at each time must maintain a low-discrepancy signing, while also minimizing the amortized recourse (the number of times any vector changes its sign) per update. For general vectors, we show algorithms which almost match Spencer's $O(\sqrt{n})$ offline discrepancy bound, with ${O}(n\cdot poly\!\log T)$ amortized recourse per update. The crucial idea is to compute a basic feasible solution to the linear relaxation in a distributed and recursive manner, which helps find a low-discrepancy signing. To bound recourse we argue that only a small part of the instance needs to be re-computed at each update. Since vector balancing has also been greatly studied for sparse vectors, we then give algorithms for low-discrepancy edge orientation, where we dynamically maintain signings for 2-sparse vectors. Alternatively, this can be seen as orienting a dynamic set of edges of an n-vertex graph to minimize the absolute difference between in- and out-degrees at any vertex. We present a deterministic algorithm with $O(poly\!\log n)$ discrepancy and $O(poly\!\log n)$ amortized recourse. The core ideas are to dynamically maintain an expander-decomposition with low recourse and then to show that, as the expanders change over time, a natural local-search algorithm converges quickly (i.e., with low recourse) to a low-discrepancy solution. We also give strong lower bounds for local-search discrepancy minimization algorithms.

A useful approach to "compress" a large network $G$ is to represent it with a {\em flow-sparsifier}, i.e., a small network $H$ that supports the same flows as $G$, up to a factor $q \geq 1$ called the quality of sparsifier. Specifically, we assume the network $G$ contains a set of $k$ terminals $T$, shared with the network $H$, i.e., $T\subseteq V(G)\cap V(H)$, and we want $H$ to preserve all multicommodity flows that can be routed between the terminals $T$. The challenge is to construct $H$ that is small. These questions have received a lot of attention in recent years, leading to some known tradeoffs between the sparsifier's quality $q$ and its size $|V(H)|$. Nevertheless, it remains an outstanding question whether every $G$ admits a flow-sparsifier $H$ with quality $q=1+ε$, or even $q=O(1)$, and size $|V(H)|\leq f(k,ε)$ (in particular, independent of $|V(G)|$ and the edge capacities). Making a first step in this direction, we present new constructions for several scenarios: * Our main result is that for quasi-bipartite networks $G$, one can construct a $(1+ε)$-flow-sparsifier of size $\poly(k/\eps)$. In contrast, exact ($q=1$) sparsifiers for this family of networks are known to require size $2^{Ω(k)}$. * For networks $G$ of bounded treewidth $w$, we construct a flow-sparsifier with quality $q=O(\log w / \log\log w)$ and size $O(w\cdot \poly(k))$. * For general networks $G$, we construct a {\em sketch} $sk(G)$, that stores all the feasible multicommodity flows up to factor $q=1+\eps$, and its size (storage requirement) is $f(k,ε)$.