arXiv++ Combinatorics

A (q,k,t)-design matrix is an m x n matrix whose pattern of zeros/non-zeros satisfies the following design-like condition: each row has at most q non-zeros, each column has at least k non-zeros and the supports of every two columns intersect in at most t rows. We prove that the rank of any (q,k,t)-design matrix over a field of characteristic zero (or sufficiently large finite characteristic) is at least n - (qtn/2k)^2 . Using this result we derive the following applications: (1) Impossibility results for 2-query LCCs over the complex numbers: A 2-query locally correctable code (LCC) is an error correcting code in which every codeword coordinate can be recovered, probabilistically, by reading at most two other code positions. Such codes have numerous applications and constructions (with exponential encoding length) are known over finite fields of small characteristic. We show that infinite families of such linear 2-query LCCs do not exist over the complex numbers. (2) Generalization of results in combinatorial geometry: We prove a quantitative analog of the Sylvester-Gallai theorem: Let $v_1,...,v_m$ be a set of points in $\C^d$ such that for every $i \in [m]$ there exists at least $δm$ values of $j \in [m]$ such that the line through $v_i,v_j$ contains a third point in the set. We show that the dimension of $\{v_1,...,v_m \}$ is at most $O(1/δ^2)$. Our results generalize to the high dimensional case (replacing lines with planes, etc.) and to the case where the points are colored (as in the Motzkin-Rabin Theorem).

We show a simple explicit construction of an $2^{\Tilde{O}(\sqrt{\log n})}$ Ramsey graph. That is, we provide a $\poly(n)$-time algorithm to output the adjacency matrix of an undirected $n$-vertex graph with no clique or independent set of size $2^{\e \sqrt{\log n}\log\log n}$ for every $\e>0$. Our construction has the very serious disadvantage over the well-known construction of Frankl and Wilson \cite{FranklWi81} that it is only explicit and not very explicit, in the sense that we do \emph{not} provide a poly-logarithmic time algorithm to compute the neighborhood relation. The main advantage of this construction is its extreme simplicity. It is also somewhat surprising that even though we use a completely different approach we get a bound which essentially equals the bound of \cite{FranklWi81}. This construction is quite simple and was obtained independently by others as well\footnote{P.~Pudlak, personal communications, July 2004.} but as far as we know has not been published elsewhere.