arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Charles Brittenham

2 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2024-01-09 v2
Random walks and the "Euclidean" association scheme in finite vector spaces
In this paper, we provide an application to the random distance-$t$ walk in finite planes and derive asymptotic formulas (as $q \to \infty$) for the probability of return to start point after $\ell$ steps based on the "vertical" equidistribution of Kloosterman sums established by N. Katz. The application of these deep results from number theory allow a determination of the second order terms in the answers that simpler spectral gap/mixing rate methods do not. This work relies on a "Euclidean" association scheme studied in prior work of W.M.Kwok, E. Bannai, O. Shimabukuro and H. Tanaka. We also provide a self-contained discussion of the P-matrix and intersection numbers of this scheme for convenience in our application as well as a more explicit form for the intersection numbers in the planar case.
Unimodality via alternating gamma vectors
Published • View PublicationBIB
For a polynomial with palindromic coefficients, unimodality is equivalent to having a nonnegative $g$-vector. A sufficient condition for unimodality is having a nonnegative $γ$-vector, though one can have negative entries in the $γ$-vector and still have a nonnegative $g$-vector. In this paper we provide combinatorial models for three families of $γ$-vectors that alternate in sign. In each case, the $γ$-vectors come from unimodal polynomials with straightforward combinatorial descriptions, but for which there is no straightforward combinatorial proof of unimodality. By using the transformation from $γ$-vector to $g$-vector, we express the entries of the $g$-vector combinatorially, but as an alternating sum. In the case of the $q$-analogue of $n!$, we use a sign-reversing involution to interpret the alternating sum, resulting in a manifestly positive formula for the $g$-vector. In other words, we give a combinatorial proof of unimodality. We consider this a "proof of concept" result that we hope can inspire a similar result for the other two cases, $\prod_{j=1}^n (1+q^j)$ and the $q$-binomial coefficients.