arXiv++ Combinatorics

Canalization is a key organizing principle in complex systems, particularly in gene regulatory networks. It describes how certain input variables exert dominant control over a function's output, thereby imposing hierarchical structure and conferring robustness to perturbations. Degeneracy, in contrast, captures redundancy among input variables and reflects the complete dominance of some variables by others. Both properties influence the stability and dynamics of discrete dynamical systems, yet their combinatorial underpinnings remain incompletely understood. Here, we derive recursive formulas for counting Boolean functions with prescribed numbers of essential variables and given canalizing properties. In particular, we determine the number of non-degenerate canalizing Boolean functions -- that is, functions for which all variables are essential and at least one variable is canalizing. Our approach extends earlier enumeration results on canalizing and nested canalizing functions. It provides a rigorous foundation for quantifying how frequently canalization occurs among random Boolean functions and for assessing its pronounced over-representation in biological network models, where it contributes to both robustness and to the emergence of distinct regulatory roles.

Stability is an important characteristic of network models that has implications for other desirable aspects such as controllability. The stability of a Boolean network depends on various factors, such as the topology of its wiring diagram and the type of the functions describing its dynamics. In this paper, we study the stability of linear Boolean networks by computing Derrida curves and quantifying the number of attractors and cycle lengths imposed by their network topologies. Derrida curves are commonly used to measure the stability of Boolean networks and several parameters such as the average in-degree K and the output bias p can indicate if a network is stable, critical, or unstable. For random unbiased Boolean networks there is a critical connectivity value Kc=2 such that if K<Kc networks operate in the ordered regime, and if K>Kc networks operate in the chaotic regime. Here, we show that for linear networks, which are the least canalizing and most unstable, the phase transition from order to chaos already happens at an average in-degree of Kc=1. Consistently, we also show that unstable networks exhibit a large number of attractors with very long limit cycles while stable and critical networks exhibit fewer attractors with shorter limit cycles. Additionally, we present theoretical results to quantify important dynamical properties of linear networks. First, we present a formula for the proportion of attractor states in linear systems. Second, we show that the expected number of fixed points in linear systems is 2, while general Boolean networks possess on average one fixed point. Third, we present a formula to quantify the number of bijective linear Boolean networks and provide a lower bound for the percentage of this type of network.

This paper studies the mathematical properties of collectively canalizing Boolean functions, a class of functions that has arisen from applications in systems biology. Boolean networks are an increasingly popular modeling framework for regulatory networks, and the class of functions studied here captures a key feature of biological network dynamics, namely that a subset of one or more variables, under certain conditions, can dominate the value of a Boolean function, to the exclusion of all others. These functions have rich mathematical properties to be explored. The paper shows how the number and type of such sets influence a function's behavior and define a new measure for the canalizing strength of any Boolean function. We further connect the concept of collective canalization with the well-studied concept of the average sensitivity of a Boolean function. The relationship between Boolean functions and the dynamics of the networks they form is important in a wide range of applications beyond biology, such as computer science, and has been studied with statistical and simulation-based methods. But the rich relationship between structure and dynamics remains largely unexplored, and this paper is intended as a contribution to its mathematical foundation.