arXiv++ Combinatorics

The change-making problem asks: given a positive integer $v$ and a collection $C$ of integer coin values $c_1=1<c_2< c_3< \cdots< c_n$, what is the minimum number of coins needed to represent $v$ with coin values from $C$? For some coin systems $C$, the greedy algorithm finds a representation with a minimum number of coins for all $v$. We call such coin systems orderly. However, there are coin systems where the greedy algorithm fails to always produce a minimal representation. Over the past fifty years, progress has been made on the change-making problem, including finding a characterization of all orderly coin systems with 3, 4, and 5 coin values. We characterize orderly coin systems with 6 coin values, and we make generalizations to orderly coin systems with $n$ coin values.

We investigate the mathematics behind unshuffles, a type of card shuffle closely related to classical perfect shuffles. To perform an unshuffle, deal all the cards alternately into two piles and then stack the one pile on top of the other. There are two ways this stacking can be done (left stack on top or right stack on top), giving rise to the terms left shuffle ($L$) and right shuffle ($R$), respectively. We give a solution to a generalization of Elmsley's Problem (a classic mathematical card trick) using unshuffles for decks with $2^k$ cards. We also find the structure of the permutation groups $\langle L, R \rangle$ for a deck of $2n$ cards for all values of $n$. We prove that the group coincides with the perfect shuffle group unless $n\equiv 3 \pmod 4$, in which case the group $\langle L, R \rangle$ is equal to $B_n$, the group of centrally symmetric permutations of $2n$ elements, while the perfect shuffle group is an index 2 subgroup of $B_n$.

Standard perfect shuffles involve splitting a deck of $2n$ cards into two stacks and interlacing the cards from the stacks. There are two ways that this interlacing can be done, commonly referred to as an in shuffle and an out shuffle, respectively. In 1983, Diaconis, Graham, and Kantor determined the permutation group generated by in and out shuffles on a deck of $2n$ cards for all $n$. Diaconis et al. concluded their work by asking whether similar results can be found for so-called generalized perfect shuffles. For these new shuffles, we split a deck of $mn$ cards into $m$ stacks and similarly interlace the cards with an in $m$-shuffle or out $m$-shuffle (denoted $I_m$ and $O_m$, respectively). In this paper, we find the structure of the group generated by these two shuffles for a deck of $m^k$ cards, together with $m^y$-shuffles, for all possible values of $m$, $k$, and $y$. The group structure is completely determined by $k/\gcd(y,k)$ and the parity of $y/\gcd(y,k)$. In particular, the group structure is independent of the value of $m$.