arXiv++ Combinatorics

We restate a process presented by Stanley as a technique to prove that there exists exactly one $d$-differential distributive lattice for any positive integer $d$. This process can be trivially extended to apply to distributive finitary lattices that have a variety of differential poset structures. It can be viewed as an algorithm for constructing such lattices. Alternatively, it can be viewed as an algorithm for analyzing and characterizing such lattices. We show that the process can be used to prove properties of all weighted-differential lattices with positive weights. We present this with the hope that this approach can be used as the basis for a complete characterization of distributive lattices with a weighted-differential structure with positive weights.

Birkhoff's representation theorem for finite distributive lattices states that any finite distributive lattice is isomorphic to the lattice of order ideals (lower sets) of the partial order of the join-irreducible elements of the lattice. We present a simplified version of Stone's extension of this theorem to general distributive lattices. We then apply this formulation to locally finite distributive lattices to produce a novel representation theorem: The lattice is isomorphic to the order ideals of the poset of prime filters of the lattice whose symmetric difference from a particular ideal is finite.

The celebrated Robinson-Schensted algorithm and each of its variants that have attracted substantial attention can be constructed using Fomin's "growth diagram" construction from a modular lattice that is also a weighted-differential poset. We classify all such lattices that meet certain criteria; the main criterion is that the lattice is distributive. Intuitively, these criteria seem excessively strict, but all known Fomin lattices satisfy all of these criteria, with the sole exception of one family that is not even distributive, the Young-Fibonacci lattices and cartesian products involving them. We discover a new class of Fomin lattices, but unfortunately they cannot be used to construct Robinson-Schensted algorithms.

Inspired by the the Kourovka Notebook of unsolved problems in group theory [KhukhMaz2024], this is a notebook of unsolved problems in the combinatorics of tableaux. Contributions to the notebook are invited.

This paper explores alternative statements of the axioms for lattice gluing, focusing on lattices that are modular, locally finite, and have finite covers, but may have infinite height. We give a set of "maximal" axioms that maximize what can be immediately adduced about the structure of a valid gluing. We also give a set of "minimal" axioms that minimize what needs to be adduced to prove that a system of blocks is a valid gluing. This system appears to be novel in the literature. A distinctive feature of the minimal axioms is that they involve only relationships between elements of the skeleton which are within an interval $[x \wedge y, x \vee y]$ where either $x$ and $y$ cover $x \wedge y$ or they are covered by $x \vee y$. That is, they have a decidedly local scope, despite that the resulting sum lattice, being modular, has global structure, such as the diamond isomorphism theorem.

This work proves that the process of gluing finite lattices to form a larger lattice is bijective, that is each lattice is the glued sum of a unique system of finite lattices, provided the class of lattices is constrained to modular, locally-finite lattices with finite covers. The results of this work are not surprising given the prior literature, but this seems to be the first proof that the processes of gluing and dissection can be made inverses, and hence that gluing is bijective.

For many equation-theoretical questions about modular lattices, Hall and Dilworth give a useful construction: Let $L_0$ be a lattice with largest element $u_0$, $L_1$ be a lattice disjoint from $L_0$ with smallest element $v_1$, and $a \in L_0$, $b \in L_1$ such that the intervals $[a, u_0]$ and $[v_1, b]$ are isomorphic. Then, after identifying those intervals you obtain $L_0 \cup L_1$, a lattice structure whose partial order is the transitive relation generated by the partial orders of $L_0$ and $L_1$. It is modular if $L_0$ and $L_1$ are modular. Since in this construction the index set $\{0, 1\}$ is essentially a chain, this work presents a method -- termed S-glued -- whereby a general family $L_x\ (x \in S)$ of lattices can specify a lattice with the small-scale lattice structure determined by the $L_x$ and the large-scale structure determined by $S$. A crucial application is representing finite-length modular lattices using projective geometries.

This is a survey of characterizations and relationships between some properties of lattices, particularly the modular, Arguesian, linear, and distributive properties, but also some other related properties. The survey emphasizes finite and finitary lattices and deemphasizes complemented lattices.

Many algorithms for inserting elements into tableaux are known, starting with the Robinson-Schensted algorithm. Much of those processes can be incorporated into the general framework of Fomin's "growth diagrams". Even for single types of tableaux, there are various alternative insertion algorithms and, due to the varying ways they are described, the relationships between the algorithms can be obscure. The distinguishing features of many algorithms can be codified into graphic "insertion diagrams" which make important aspects of the algorithms immediately apparent. We use insertion diagrams to build a graphic catalog or picture book of many of the tableau insertion algorithms in the literature.

Birkhoff's representation theorem for finite distributive lattices states that any finite distributive lattice is isomorphic to the lattice of order ideals (lower sets) of the partial order of the join-irreducible elements of the lattice. This theorem can be extended as follows: A non-finite distributive lattice that is locally finite and has a $\hat{0}$ is isomorphic to the lattice of finite order ideals of the partial order of the join-irreducible elements of the lattice. In addition, certain ``well ordering'' properties are shown to be equivalent to the premises of the extended theorem.