arXiv++ Combinatorics

We observe a network scenario where parts of a secret are distributed among its nodes. Within the network, a group of attackers is actively trying to obtain the complete secret, while there is also the issue of some nodes malfunctioning or being absent. In this paper, we address this problem by employing graph multicoloring techniques, focusing on the case of a single attacker and varying numbers of malfunctioning nodes.

The applications of graph coloring are diverse and many so lots of new types of coloring are being proposed and explored. Here we define a safe k-coloring, motivated by the application of coloring to secret sharing. Secret sharing is a way of securing a secret from a number of attackers by dividing it into parts and then distributing those parts to some persons, represented here by graph vertices. Parts of the secret are represented by colors which are then assigned to the vertices under certain conditions, making a coloring safe if a predetermined number of attackers cannot read the whole secret, nor disable the rest of the group from doing so. We observe a fixed number of colors, namely 3, and analyze what kind of graphs have a safe 3-coloring.

Vertex coloring and multicoloring of graphs are a well known subject in graph theory, as well as their applications. In vertex multicoloring, each vertex is assigned some subset of a given set of colors. Here we propose a new kind of vertex multicoloring, motivated by the situation of sharing a secret and securing it from the actions of some number of attackers. We name the multicoloring a highly $a$-resistant vertex $k$-multicoloring, where $a$ is the number of the attackers, and $k$ the number of colors. For small values $a$ we determine what is the minimal number of vertices a graph must have in order to allow such a coloring, and what is the minimal number of colors needed.

In communication networks theory the concepts of networkness and network surplus have recently been defined. Together with transmission and betweenness centrality, they were based on the assumption of equal communication between vertices. Generalised versions of these four descriptors were presented, taking into account that communication between vertices $u$ and $v$ is decreasing as the distance between them is increasing. Therefore, we weight the quantity of communication by $λ^{d(u,v)}$ where $λ\in \left\langle0,1 \right\rangle$. Extremal values of these descriptors are analysed.