arXiv++ Combinatorics

An antimagic labeling of a graph $G(V,E)$ is a bijection $f: E \to \{1,2, \dots, |E|\}$ so that $\sum_{e \in E(u)} f(e) \neq \sum_{e \in E(v)} f(e)$ holds for all $u, v \in V(G)$ with $u \neq v$, where $E(v)$ is the set of edges incident to $v$. We call $G$ antimagic if it admits an antimagic labeling. A forest is a graph without cycles; equivalently, every component of a forest is a tree. It was proved by Kaplan, Lev, and Roditty [2009], and by Liang, Wong, and Zhu [2014] that every tree with at most one vertex of degree-2 is antimagic. A major tool used in the proof is the zero-sum partition introduced by Kaplan, Lev, and Roditty [2009]. In this article, we provide an algorithmic representation for the zero-sum partition method and apply this method to show that every forest with at most one vertex of degree-2 is also antimagic.

An antimagic labeling for a graph $G$ with $m$ edges is a bijection $f: E(G) \to \{1, 2, \dots, m\}$ so that $φ_f(u) \neq φ_f(v)$ holds for any pair of distinct vertices $u, v \in V(G)$, where $φ_f(x) = \sum_{x \in e} f(e)$. A strongly antimagic labeling is an antimagic labeling with an additional condition: For any $u, v \in V(G)$, if $°(u) > °(v)$, then $φ_f(u) > φ_f(v)$. A graph $G$ is strongly antimagic if it admits a strongly antimagic labeling. We present inductive properties of strongly antimagic labelings of graphs. This approach leads to simplified proofs that spiders and double spiders are strongly antimagic, previously shown by Shang [Spiders are antimagic, Ars Combinatoria, 118 (2015), 367--372] and Huang [Antimagic labeling on spiders, Master's Thesis, Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan University, 2015], and by Chang, Chin, Li and Pan [The strongly antimagic labelings of double spiders, Indian J. Discrete Math. 6 (2020), 43--68], respectively. We fix a subtle error in [The strongly antimagic labelings of double spiders, Indian J. Discrete Math. 6 (2020), 43--68]. Further, we prove certain level-wise regular trees, cycle spiders and cycle double spiders are all strongly antimagic.

Let $G$ be a graph with $m$ edges and let $f$ be a bijection from $E(G)$ to $\{1,2, \dots, m\}$. For any vertex $v$, denote by $φ_f(v)$ the sum of $f(e)$ over all edges $e$ incident to $v$. If $φ_f(v) \neq φ_f(u)$ holds for any two distinct vertices $u$ and $v$, then $f$ is called an {\it antimagic labeling} of $G$. We call $G$ {\it antimagic} if such a labeling exists. Hartsfield and Ringel in 1991 conjectured that all connected graphs except $P_2$ are antimagic. Denote the disjoint union of graphs $G$ and $H$ by $G \cup H$, and the disjoint union of $t$ copies of $G$ by $tG$. For an antimagic graph $G$ (connected or disconnected), we define the parameter $τ(G)$ to be the maximum integer such that $G \cup tP_3$ is antimagic for all $t \leq τ(G)$. Chang, Chen, Li, and Pan showed that for all antimagic graphs $G$, $τ(G)$ is finite [Graphs and Combinatorics 37 (2021), 1065--1182]. Further, Shang, Lin, Liaw [Util. Math. 97 (2015), 373--385] and Li [Master Thesis, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan, 2019] found the exact value of $τ(G)$ for special families of graphs: star forests and balanced double stars respectively. They did this by finding explicit antimagic labelings of $G\cup tP_3$ and proving a tight upper bound on $τ(G)$ for these special families. In the present paper, we generalize their results by proving an upper bound on $τ(G)$ for all graphs. For star forests and balanced double stars, this general bound is equivalent to the bounds given in \cite{star forest} and \cite{double star} and tight. In addition, we prove that the general bound is also tight for every other graph we have studied, including an infinite family of jellyfish graphs, cycles $C_n$ where $3 \leq n \leq 9$, and the double triangle $2C_3$.

Let $G$ be a simple connected graph. For any two vertices $u$ and $v$, let $d(u,v)$ denote the distance between $u$ and $v$ in $G$, and let $diam(G)$ denote the diameter of $G$. A radio-labeling of $G$ is a function $f$ which assigns to each vertex a non-negative integer (label) such that for every distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ in $G$, it holds that $|f(u)-f(v)| \geq diam(G) - d(u,v) +1$. The span of $f$ is the difference between the largest and smallest labels of $f(V)$. The radio number of $G$, denoted by $rn(G)$, is the smallest span of a radio labeling admitted by $G$. In this paper, we give a lower bound for the radio number of the Cartesian product of two trees. Moreover, we present three necessary and sufficient conditions, and three sufficient conditions for the product of two trees to achieve this bound. Applying these results, we determine the radio number of the Cartesian product of two stars as well as a path and a star.

A radio labeling of a graph $G$ is a mapping $f$ : $V(G) \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2,...\}$ such that $|f(u)-f(v)| \geq diam(G) + 1 - d(u,v)$ holds for every pair of vertices $u$ and $v$, where $diam(G)$ is the diameter of $G$ and $d(u,v)$ is the distance between $u$ and $v$ in $G$. The radio number of $G$, denoted by $rn(G)$, is the smallest $t$ such that $G$ admits a radio labeling with $t=\max\{|f(v)-f(u)|: v, u \in V(G)\}$. A block graph is a graph such that each block (induced maximal 2-connected subgraph) is a complete graph. In this paper, a lower bound for the radio number of block graphs is established. The block graph which achieves this bound is called a lower bound block graph. We prove three necessary and sufficient conditions for lower bound block graphs. Moreover, we give three sufficient conditions for a graph to be a lower bound block graph. Applying the established bound and conditions, we show that several families of block graphs are lower bound block graphs, including the level-wise regular block graphs and the extended star of blocks. The line graph of a graph $G(V,E)$ has $E(G)$ as the vertex set, where two vertices are adjacent if they are incident edges in $G$. We extend our results to trees as trees and its line graphs are block graphs. We prove that if a tree is a lower bound block graph then, under certain conditions, its line graph is also a lower bound block graph, and vice versa. Consequently, we show that the line graphs of many known lower bound trees, excluding paths, are lower bound block graphs.

Let $G$ be a simple connected graph. For any two vertices $u$ and $v$, let $d(u,v)$ denote the distance between $u$ and $v$ in $G$. A radio-$k$-labeling of $G$ for a fixed positive integer $k$ is a function $f$ which assigns to each vertex a non-negative integer label such that for every two vertices $u$ and $ v $ in $G$, $|f(u)-f(v)| \geq k - d(u,v) +1$. The span of $f$ is the difference between the largest and smallest labels of $f(V)$. The radio-$k$-number of a graph $G$, denoted by $rn_k(G)$, is the smallest span among all radio-$k$-labelings admitted by $G$. A cycle $C_n$ has diameter $d=\lfloor n/2 \rfloor$. In this paper, we combine a lower bound approach with cyclic group structure to determine the value of $ rn_k(C_n)$ for $k \geq n-3$. For $d \leq k < n-3$, we obtain the values of $rn_k(C_n)$ when $n$ and $k$ have the same parity, and prove partial results when $n$ and $k$ have different parities. Our results extend the known values of $rn_d (C_n)$ and $rn_{d+1} (C_n)$ shown by Liu and Zhu, and by Karst, Langowitz, Oehrlein and Troxell, respectively.

Fix a set $D$ of positive integers. We study the maximum density $μ(D)$ of sequences of integers in which the separation between any two terms does not fall in $D$. The $D$-sets considered in this article are of the form $\{1,j,k\}$. The closely related function $κ(D)$, the parameter involved in the "lonely runner conjecture," is also investigated. Exact values of $κ(D)$ and $μ(D)$ are found for some families of $D=\{1,j,k\}$. We prove that the boundary conditions in two earlier results of Haralambis are sharp. Consequently, our results declaim two conjectures posted recently, and extend some results by Gupta.