arXiv++ Combinatorics

A dot-product representation of a graph is a mapping of its vertices to vectors of length $k$ so that vertices are adjacent if and only if the inner product (a.k.a. dot product) of their corresponding vertices exceeds some threshold. Minimizing dimension of the vector space into which the vectors must be mapped is a typical focus. We investigate this and structural characterizations of graphs whose dot product representations are mappings into the tropical semi-rings of min-plus and max-plus. We also observe that the minimum dimension required to represent a graph using a \emph{tropical representation} is equal to the better-known threshold dimension of the graph; that is, the minimum number of subgraphs that are threshold graphs whose union is the graph being represented.

A $(0,1)$-labelling of a set is said to be {\em friendly} if approximately one half the elements of the set are labelled 0 and one half labelled 1. Let $g$ be a labelling of the edge set of a graph that is induced by a labelling $f$ of the vertex set. If both $g$ and $f$ are friendly then $g$ is said to be a {\em cordial} labelling of the graph. We extend this concept to directed graphs and investigate the cordiality of sets of directed graphs. We investigate a specific type of cordiality on digraphs, a restriction of quasigroup-cordiality called $(2,3)$-cordiality. A directed graph is $(2,3)$-cordial if there is a friendly labelling $f$ of the vertex set which induces a $(1,-1,0)$-labelling of the arc set $g$ such that about one third of the arcs are labelled 1, about one third labelled -1 and about one third labelled 0. In particular we determine which tournaments are $(2,3)$-cordial, which orientations of the $n$-wheel are $(2,3)$-cordial, and which orientations of the $n -$fan are $(2,3)$-cordial.

Recently L. B. Beasley introduced $(2,3)$-cordial labelings of directed graphs in [1]. He made two conjectures which we resolve in this article. He conjectured that every orientation of a path of length at least five is $(2,3)$ cordial, and that every tree of max degree $n =3$ has a cordial orientation. We show these two conjectures to be false. We also discuss the $(2,3)$ cordiality of orientations of the Petersen graph, and establish an upper bound for the number of edges a graph can have and still be $(2,3)$ cordial. An application of $(2,3)$ cordial labelings is also presented.