arXiv++ Combinatorics

In \cite{entombed}, John Aycock and Tara Copplestone pose an open question, namely the explanation of the mysterious lookup table used in the Entombed Game's Algorithm for two dimensional maze generation. The question attracted media attention (BBC etc) and was open until today. This paper answers this question, explains the algorithm and even extends it to three dimensions.

In this paper we consider a variant of Conway's sequence (OEIS A005150, A006715) defined as follows: the next term in the sequence is obtained by considering contiguous runs of digits, and rewriting them as $ab$ where $b$ is the digit and $a$ is the maximum of $b$ and the run's length. We dub this the "look-and-say the biggest" (LSB) sequence. Conway's sequence is very similar ($b$ is just the run's length). For any starting value except 22, Conway's sequence grows exponentially: the ration of lengths converges to a known constant $λ$. We show that LSB does not: for every starting value, LSB eventually reaches a cycle. Furthermore, all cycles have a period of at most 9.

A look-and-say sequence is obtained iteratively by reading off the digits of the current value, grouping identical digits together: starting with 1, the sequence reads: 1, 11, 21, 1211, 111221, 312211, etc. (OEIS A005150). Starting with any digit $d \neq 1$ gives Conway's sequence: $d$, $1d$, $111d$, $311d$, $13211d$, etc. (OEIS A006715). Conway popularised these sequences and studied some of their properties. In this paper we consider a variant subbed "look-and-say again" where digits are repeated twice. We prove that the look-and-say again sequence contains only the digits $1, 2, 4, 6, d$, where $d$ represents the starting digit. Such sequences decompose and the ratio of successive lengths converges to Conway's constant. In fact, these properties result from a commuting diagram between look-and-say again sequences and "classical" look-and-say sequences. Similar results apply to the "look-and-say three times" sequence.