arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this paper we count set closure systems (also known as Moore families) for the case when all single element sets are closed. In particular, we give the numbers of such strict (empty set included) and non-strict families for the base set of size $n=6$. We also provide the number of such inequivalent Moore families with respect to all permutations of the base set up to $n=6$. The search in OEIS and existing literature revealed the coincidence of the found numbers with the entry for D.\ M.~Davis' set union lattice (\seqnum{A235604}, up to $n=5$) and $|\mathcal L_n|$, the number of atomic lattices on $n$ atoms, obtained by S.\ Mapes (up to $n=6$), respectively. Thus we study all those cases, establish one-to-one correspondences between them via Galois adjunctions and Formal Concept Analysis, and provide the reader with two of our enumerative algorithms as well as with the results of these algorithms used for additional tests. Other results include the largest size of intersection free families for $n=6$ plus our conjecture for $n=7$, an upper bound for the number of atomic lattices $\mathcal L_n$, and some structural properties of $\mathcal L_n$ based on the theory of extremal lattices.

Machine Learning (ML) provides important techniques for classification and predictions. Most of these are black-box models for users and do not provide decision-makers with an explanation. For the sake of transparency or more validity of decisions, the need to develop explainable/interpretable ML-methods is gaining more and more importance. Certain questions need to be addressed: How does an ML procedure derive the class for a particular entity? Why does a particular clustering emerge from a particular unsupervised ML procedure? What can we do if the number of attributes is very large? What are the possible reasons for the mistakes for concrete cases and models? For binary attributes, Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) offers techniques in terms of intents of formal concepts, and thus provides plausible reasons for model prediction. However, from the interpretable machine learning viewpoint, we still need to provide decision-makers with the importance of individual attributes to the classification of a particular object, which may facilitate explanations by experts in various domains with high-cost errors like medicine or finance. We discuss how notions from cooperative game theory can be used to assess the contribution of individual attributes in classification and clustering processes in concept-based machine learning. To address the 3rd question, we present some ideas on how to reduce the number of attributes using similarities in large contexts.