arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this paper we study relations between connected and weakly convex domination numbers. We show that in general the difference between these numbers can be arbitrarily large and we focus on the graphs for which a weakly convex domination number equals a connected domination number. We also study the influence of the edge removing on the weakly convex domination number, in particular we prove that the weakly convex domination number is an interpolating function.

A group of mobile agents is given a task to explore an edge-weighted graph $G$, i.e., every vertex of $G$ has to be visited by at least one agent. There is no centralized unit to coordinate their actions, but they can freely communicate with each other. The goal is to construct a deterministic strategy which allows agents to complete their task optimally. In this paper we are interested in a cost-optimal strategy, where the cost is understood as the total distance traversed by agents coupled with the cost of invoking them. Two graph classes are analyzed, rings and trees, in the off-line and on-line setting, i.e., when a structure of a graph is known and not known to agents in advance. We present algorithms that compute the optimal solutions for a given ring and tree of order $n$, in $O(n)$ time units. For rings in the on-line setting, we give the $2$-competitive algorithm and prove the lower bound of $3/2$ for the competitive ratio for any on-line strategy. For every strategy for trees in the on-line setting, we prove the competitive ratio to be no less than $2$, which can be achieved by the $DFS$ algorithm.

Let $D=(V,A)$ be a digraph. A subset $S$ of $V$ is called a twin dominating set of $D$ if for every vertex $v\in V-S$, there exists vertices $u_1,u_2 \in S$ such that $(v,u_1)$ and $(u_2,v)$ are arcs in $D$. The minimum cardinality of a twin dominating set in $D$ is called the twin domination number of $D$ and is denoted by $γ^{*}(D)$. The upper orientable twin domination number of a graph $G$ is $DOM^{*}(G)=\max\{ γ^{*}(D)|D \ \text{is an orientation of G} \}.$ It has been conjectured that for the complete graph $K_n$ with $n\geq 8$, $DOM^{*}(K_n)=\left\lceil \frac{n+1}{2}\right\rceil$. In this work we prove $DOM^{*}(K_8)= DOM^{*}(K_9)= 4$ and establish new upper bounds for $DOM^{*}(K_n)$, disproving the same above conjecture for all $n \geq 8$.