arXiv++ Combinatorics

Most bounds on the size of codes hold for any code, whether linear or nonlinear. Notably, the Griesmer bound, holds only in the linear case. In this paper we characterize a family of systematic nonlinear codes for which the Griesmer bound holds. Moreover, we show that the Griesmer bound does not necessarily hold for a systematic code by showing explicit counterexamples. On the other hand, we are also able to provide (weaker) versions of the Griesmer bound holding for all systematic codes.

We present some upper bounds on the size of non-linear codes and their restriction to systematic codes and linear codes. These bounds are independent of other known theoretical bounds, e.g. the Griesmer bound, the Johnson bound or the Plotkin bound, and one of these is actually an improvement of a bound by Litsyn and Laihonen. Our experiments show that in some cases (the majority of cases for some q) our bounds provide the best value, compared to all other theoretical bounds.

An identifying code of a graph G is a dominating set C such that every vertex x of G is distinguished from all other vertices by the set of vertices in C that are at distance at most 1 from x. The problem of finding an identifying code of minimum possible size turned out to be a challenging problem. It was proved by N. Bertrand that if a graph on n vertices with at least one edge admits an identifying code, then a minimum identifying code has size at most n-1. Some classes of graphs whose smallest identifying code is of size n-1 were already known, and few conjectures were formulated to classify all these graphs. In this paper, disproving these conjectures, we classify all finite graphs for which all but one of the vertices are needed to form an identifying code. We also classify all infinite graphs needing the whole set of vertices in any identifying code. New upper bounds in terms of the number of vertices and the maximum degree of a graph are also provided.