Papers by Eliseo Sarmiento Rosales
2 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Hindman and Owings-like theorems without the Axiom of Choice
We investigate Hindman- and Owings-type Ramsey-theoretic statements in Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory without the Axiom of Choice, with some occasional extra assumptions (such as the Axiom of Dependent Choice and/or the Axiom of Determinacy). We study several variations of Hindman's theorem on $\mathbb Q$-vector spaces; notably, we show that the uncountable analog of Hindman's theorem fails for the additive group of $\mathbb R$ (under ZF), and for $\mathbb Q$-vector spaces of uncountable dimension (under DC if such dimension is not well-orderable), among other results. In contrast, for Owings-type configurations, we obtain several positive results, especially when assuming AD. These results highlight the interaction between determinacy, algebraic structure, and dimension in the study of infinite Ramsey theory without the Axiom of Choice.
Owings-like theorems for infinitely many colours or finite monochromatic sets
Published in Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 175 (2024), 103495
• Search Publication
Inspired by Owings's problem, we investigate whether, for a given an Abelian group $G$ and cardinal numbers $κ,θ$, every colouring $c:G\longrightarrowθ$ yields a subset $X\subseteq G$ with $|X|=κ$ such that $X+X$ is monochromatic. (Owings's problem asks this for $G=\mathbb Z$, $θ=2$ and $κ=\aleph_0$; this is known to be false for the same $G$ and $κ$ but $θ=3$.) We completely settle the question for $κ$ and $θ$ both finite (by obtaining sufficient and necessary conditions for a positive answer) and for $κ$ and $θ$ both infinite (with a negative answer). Also, in the case where $θ$ is infinite but $κ$ is finite, we obtain some sufficient conditions for a negative answer as well as an example with a positive answer.