arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Emad Zahedi

4 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2018-05-24
Modular Decomposition of Graphs and the Distance Preserving Property
Published • View PublicationBIB
Given a graph $G$, a subgraph $H$ is isometric if $d_H(u,v) = d_G(u,v)$ for every pair $u,v\in V(H)$, where $d$ is the distance function. A graph $G$ is distance preserving (dp) if it has an isometric subgraph of every possible order. A graph is sequentially distance preserving (sdp) if its vertices can be ordered such that deleting the first $i$ vertices results in an isometric subgraph, for all $i\ge1$. We introduce a generalisation of the lexicographic product of graphs, which can be used to non-trivially describe graphs. This generalisation is the inverse of the modular decomposition of graphs, which divides the graph into disjoint clusters called modules. Using these operations, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for graphs to be dp. Finally, we show that the Cartesian product of a dp graph and an sdp graph is dp.
2017-01-17 v2
On Distance Preserving and Sequentially Distance Preserving Graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
A graph $H$ is an \emph{isometric} subgraph of $G$ if $d_H(u,v)= d_G(u,v)$, for every pair~$u,v\in V(H)$. A graph is \emph{distance preserving} if it has an isometric subgraph of every possible order. A graph is \emph{sequentially distance preserving} if its vertices can be ordered such that deleting the first $i$ vertices results in an isometric subgraph, for all $i\ge1$. We give an equivalent condition to sequentially distance preserving based upon simplicial orderings. Using this condition, we prove that if a graph does not contain any induced cycles of length~$5$ or greater, then it is sequentially distance preserving and thus distance preserving. Next we consider the distance preserving property on graphs with a cut vertex. Finally, we define a family of non-distance preserving graphs constructed from cycles.
2015-07-16 v4
Distance preserving graphs and graph products
If $G$ is a graph then a subgraph $H$ is $isometric$ if, for every pair of vertices $u,v$ of $H$, we have $d_H(u,v) = d_G(u,v)$ where $d$ is the distance function. We say a graph $G$ is $distance\ preserving\ (dp)$ if it has an isometric subgraph of every possible order up to the order of $G$. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for the lexicographic product of two graphs to be a dp graph. A graph $G$ is $sequentially\ distance\ preserving\ (sdp)$ if the vertex set of $G$ can be ordered so that, for all $i\ge1$, deleting the first $i$ vertices in the sequence results in an isometric graph. We show that the Cartesian product of two graphs is sdp if and only if each of them is sdp. In closing, we state a conjecture concerning the Cartesian products of dp graphs.
2015-07-13
Distance Preserving Graphs
Given a graph $G$ then a subgraph $H$ is $isometric$ if, for every pair of vertices $u,v$ of $H$, we have $d_H(u,v) = d_G(u,v)$. We say a graph $G$ is $distance\ preserving\ (dp)$ if it has an isometric subgraph of every possible order up to the order of $G$. We consider how to add a vertex to a dp graph so that the result is a dp graph. This condition implies that chordal graphs are dp. We also find a condition on the girth of $G$ which implies that it is not dp. In closing, we discuss other work and open problems concerning dp graphs.