arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a finite undirected graph $X$, a vertex is $0$-dismantlable if its open neighbourhood is a cone and $X$ is $0$-dismantlable if it is reducible to a single vertex by successive deletions of $0$-dismantlable vertices. By an iterative process, a vertex is $(k+1)$-dismantlable if its open neighbourhood is $k$-dismantlable and a graph is $k$-dismantlable if it is reducible to a single vertex by successive deletions of $k$-dismantlable vertices. We introduce a graph family, the cubion graphs, in order to prove that $k$-dismantlabilities give a strict hierarchy in the class of graphs whose clique complex is non-evasive. We point out how these higher dismantlabilities are related to the derivability of graphs defined by Mazurkievicz and we get a new characterization of the class of closed graphs he defined. By generalising the notion of vertex transitivity, we consider the issue of higher dismantlabilities in link with the evasiveness conjecture.

In this note, we prove that a finite vertex-transitive graph which has a clique which intersects all maximal cliques is a complete graph. This gives a positive answer in the case of vertex-transitive graphs to a question raised by Berge and Payan. It also gives a positive answer to a special case of the evasiveness conjecture.

We study dismantlability in graphs. In order to compare this notion to similar operations in posets (partially ordered sets) or in simplicial complexes, we prove that a graph G dismants on a subgraph H if and only if H is a strong deformation retract of G. Then, by looking at a triangle relating graphs, posets and simplicial complexes, we get a precise correspondence of the various notions of dismantlability in each framework. As an application, we study the link between the graph of morphisms from a graph G to a graph H and the polyhedral complex Hom(G,H); this gives a more precise statement about well known results concerning the polyhedral complex Hom(G,H) and its relation with foldings in G or H.

A flag complex can be defined as a simplicial complex whose simplices correspond to complete subgraphs of its 1-skeleton taken as a graph. In this article, by introducing the notion of s-dismantlability, we shall define the s-homotopy type of a graph and show in particular that two finite graphs have the same s-homotopy type if, and only if, the two flag complexes determined by these graphs have the same simplicial simple-homotopy type (Theorem 2.10, part 1). This result is closely related to similar results established by Barmak and Minian (Adv. in Math., 218 (2008), 87-104) in the framework of posets and we give the relation between the two approaches (theorems 3.5 and 3.7). We conclude with a question about the relation between the s-homotopy and the graph homotopy defined by Chen, Yau and Yeh (Discrete Math., 241(2001), 153-170).