arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Evan M. O'Dorney

2 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2023-02-27 v2
Renaissance canons with asymmetric schemes
Published in Journal of Mathematics and Music, 18(2), 228-254, 2023 • View PublicationBIB
By a "scheme" of a musical canon, we mean the time and pitch displacement of each entering voice. When the time displacements are unequal, achieving consonant sonorities is especially challenging. Using a first-species theoretical model, we quantify the flexibility of schemes that Renaissance composers used or could have used. We craft an algorithm to compute this flexibility value precisely (finding in the process that it is an algebraic integer). We find that Palestrina consistently selected some of the most flexible schemes, more so than his predecessors, but that he by no means exhausted all feasible schemes. To add support to the model, we present two new compositions within the limits of the style utilizing unexplored canonic schemes. In the Online Supplement (attached via Papers with Code), we provide MIDI realizations of the musical examples and Sage code used in the numerical computations.
2014-07-17
Canonical rings of Q-divisors on P^1
Published in ODorney, Evan. Ann. Comb. (2015) 19: 765 • View PublicationBIB
The canonical ring $S_D = \bigoplus_{d \geq 0} H^0(X, \lfloor dD \rfloor)$ of a divisor D on a curve X is a natural object of study; when D is a Q-divisor, it has connections to projective embeddings of stacky curves and rings of modular forms. We study the generators and relations of S_D for the simplest curve X = P^1. When D contains at most two points, we give a complete description of S_D; for general D, we give bounds on the generators and relations. We also show that the generators (for at most five points) and a Groebner basis of relations between them (for at most four points) depend only on the coefficients in the divisor D, not its points or the characteristic of the ground field; we conjecture that the minimal system of relations varies in a similar way. Although stated in terms of algebraic geometry, our results are proved by translating to the combinatorics of lattice points in simplices and cones.