arXiv++ Combinatorics

Divide-and-conquer dividing by a half recurrences, of the form $x_n =a\cdot x_{\left\lceil{n}/{2}\right\rceil}+a\cdot x_{\left\lfloor{n}/{2}\right\rfloor}+p(n)$, $n\geq 2$, appear in many areas of applied mathematics, from the analysis of algorithms to the optimization of phylogenetic balance indices. The Master Theorems that solve these equations do not provide the solution's explicit expression, only its big-$Θ$ order of growth. In this paper we give an explicit expression (in terms of the binary decomposition of $n$) for the solution $x_n$ of a recurrence of this form, with given initial condition $x_1$, when the independent term $p(n)$ is a polynomial in $\lceil{n}/{2}\rceil$ and $\lfloor{n}/{2}\rfloor$.

The Colless index for bifurcating phylogenetic trees, introduced by Colless (1982), is defined as the sum, over all internal nodes $v$ of the tree, of the absolute value of the difference of the sizes of the clades defined by the children of $v$. It is one of the most popular phylogenetic balance indices, because, in addition to measuring the balance of a tree in a very simple and intuitive way, it turns out to be one of the most powerful and discriminating phylogenetic shape indices. But it has some drawbacks. On the one hand, although its minimum value is reached at the so-called maximally balanced trees, it is almost always reached also at trees that are not maximally balanced. On the other hand, its definition as a sum of absolute values of differences makes it difficult to study analytically its distribution under probabilistic models of bifurcating phylogenetic trees. In this paper we show that if we replace in its definition the absolute values of the differences of clade sizes by the squares of these differences, all these drawbacks are overcome and the resulting index is still more powerful and discriminating than the original Colless index.

Measures of tree balance play an important role in the analysis of phylogenetic trees. One of the oldest and most popular indices in this regard is the Colless index for rooted bifurcating trees, introduced by Colless (1982). While many of its statistical properties under different probabilistic models for phylogenetic trees have already been established, little is known about its minimum value and the trees that achieve it. In this manuscript, we fill this gap in the literature. To begin with, we derive both recursive and closed expressions for the minimum Colless index of a tree with $n$ leaves. Surprisingly, these expressions show a connection between the minimum Colless index and the so-called Blancmange curve, a fractal curve. We then fully characterize the tree shapes that achieve this minimum value and we introduce both an algorithm to generate them and a recurrence to count them. After focusing on two extremal classes of trees with minimum Colless index (the maximally balanced trees and the greedy from the bottom trees), we conclude by showing that all trees with minimum Colless index also have minimum Sackin index, another popular balance index.

The Colless index is one of the oldest and most widely used balance indices for rooted bifurcating trees. Despite its popularity, its minimum value on the space $\mathcal{T}_n$ of rooted bifurcating trees with $n$ leaves is only known when $n$ is a power of 2. In this paper we fill this gap in the literature, by providing a formula that computes, for each $n$, the minimum Colless index on $\mathcal{T}_n$, and characterizing those trees where this minimum value is reached.

The Colless index is one of the most popular and natural balance indices for bifurcating phylogenetic trees, but it makes no sense for multifurcating trees. In this paper we propose a family of Colless-like balance indices $\mathfrak{C}_{D,f}$, which depend on a dissimilarity $D$ and a function $f:\mathbb{N}\to \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$, that generalize the Colless index to multifurcating phylogenetic trees. We provide two functions $f$ such that the most balanced phylogenetic trees according to the corresponding indices $\mathfrak{C}_{D,f}$ are exactly the fully symmetric ones. Next, for each one of these two functions $f$ and for three popular dissimilarities $D$ (the variance, the standard deviation, and the mean deviation from the median), we determine the range of values of $\mathfrak{C}_{D,f}$ on the sets of phylogenetic trees with a given number $n$ of leaves. We end the paper by assessing the performance of one of these indices on TreeBASE and using it to show that the trees in this database do not seem to follow either the uniform model for multifurcating trees or the $α$-$γ$-model, for any values of $α$ and $γ$.

We give correct explicit formulas for the probabilities of rooted binary trees and cladograms under Ford's $α$-model.