arXiv++ Combinatorics

The Secretary problem is a classical sequential decision-making question that can be succinctly described as follows: a set of rank-ordered applicants are interviewed sequentially for a single position. Once an applicant is interviewed, an immediate and irrevocable decision is made if the person is to be offered the job or not and only applicants observed so far can be used in the decision process. The problem of interest is to identify the stopping rule that maximizes the probability of hiring the highest-ranked applicant. A multiple-choice version of the Secretary problem, known as the Dowry problem, assumes that one is given a fixed integer budget for the total number of selections allowed to choose the best applicant. It has been solved using tools from dynamic programming and optimal stopping theory. We provide the first combinatorial proof for a related new \emph{query-based model} for which we are allowed to solicit the response of an expert to determine if an applicant is optimal. Since the selection criteria differ from those of the Dowry problem we obtain nonidentical expected stopping times. Our result indicates that an optimal strategy is the $(a_s, a_{s-1}, \ldots, a_1)$-strategy, i.e., for the $i^{th}$ selection, where $1 \le i \le s$ and $1 \le j = s+1-i \le s$, we reject the first $a_j$ applicants, wait until the decision of the $(i-1)^{th}$ selection (if $i \ge 2$), and then accept the next applicant whose qualification is better than all previously appeared applicants. Furthermore, our optimal strategy is right-hand based, i.e., the optimal strategies for two models with $s_1$ and $s_2$ selections in total ($s_1 < s_2$) share the same sequence $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_{s_1}$ when it is viewed from the right. When the total number of applicants tends to infinity, our result agrees with the thresholds obtained by Gilbert and Mosteller.

We study the secretary problem in which rank-ordered lists are generated by the Mallows model and the goal is to identify the highest-ranked candidate through a sequential interview process which does not allow rejected candidates to be revisited. The main difference between our formulation and existing models is that, during the selection process, we are given a fixed number of opportunities to query an infallible expert whether the current candidate is the highest-ranked or not. If the response is positive, the selection process terminates, otherwise, the search continues until a new potentially optimal candidate is identified. Our optimal interview strategy, as well as the expected number of candidates interviewed and the expected number of queries used, can be determined through the evaluation of well-defined recurrence relations. Specifically, if we are allowed to query $s-1$ times and to make a final selection without querying (thus, making $s$ selections in total) then the optimum scheme is characterized by $s$ thresholds that depend on the parameter $θ$ of the Mallows distribution but are independent on the maximum number of queries.