arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study multiplicative graph spanners in the $f$-degree fault tolerant ($f$-DFT) model, in which the spanner must approximately preserve distances even after any subset of edges of maximum degree $f$ temporarily "fails" and is removed from the graph. We prove that there are $n$-node lower bound graphs for which any $f$-DFT $(2k-1)$-stretch spanner $H$ must have size $$|E(H)| \ge Ω\left( f^{1-1/k} n^{1+1/k}\right).$$ This matches a lower bound that was previously only known to hold conditionally, under the 1963 girth conjecture of Erdős. It also matches the current upper bounds, up to a factor of $\texttt{exp}(k)$. Our proof is an analysis of the so-called Wenger graphs (J. Comb. Theory 1991), via their recent reinterpretation by Szabó and by Conlon (Am. Math. Monthly 2021).

When regularity lemmas were first developed in the 1970s, they were described as results that promise a partition of any graph into a ``small'' number of parts, such that the graph looks ``similar'' to a random graph on its edge subsets going between parts. Regularity lemmas have been repeatedly refined and reinterpreted in the years since, and the modern perspective is that they can instead be seen as purely linear-algebraic results about sketching a large, complicated matrix with a smaller, simpler one. These matrix sketches then have a nice interpretation about partitions when applied to the adjacency matrix of a graph. In these notes we will develop regularity lemmas from scratch, under the linear-algebraic perspective, and then use the linear-algebraic versions to derive the familiar graph versions. We do not assume any prior knowledge of regularity lemmas, and we recap the relevant linear-algebraic definitions as we go, but some comfort with linear algebra will definitely be helpful to read these notes.

There has recently been significant interest in fault tolerant spanners, which are spanners that still maintain their stretch guarantees after some nodes or edges fail. This work has culminated in an almost complete understanding of the three-way tradeoff between stretch, sparsity, and number of faults tolerated. However, despite some progress in metric settings, there have been no results to date on the tradeoff in general graphs between stretch, lightness, and number of faults tolerated. We initiate the study of light edge fault tolerant (EFT) graph spanners, obtaining the first such results. First, we observe that lightness can be unbounded if we use the traditional definition (normalizing by the MST). We then argue that a natural definition of fault-tolerant lightness is to instead normalize by a min-weight fault tolerant connectivity preserver; essentially, a fault-tolerant version of the MST. However, even with this, we show that it is still not generally possible to construct $f$-EFT spanners whose weight compares reasonably to the weight of a min-weight $f$-EFT connectivity preserver. In light of this lower bound, it is natural to then consider bicriteria notions of lightness, where we compare the weight of an $f$-EFT spanner to a min-weight $(f' > f)$-EFT connectivity preserver. The most interesting question is to determine the minimum value of $f'$ that allows for reasonable lightness upper bounds. Our main result is a precise answer to this question: $f' = 2f$. In particular, we show that the lightness can be untenably large (roughly $n/k$ for a $k$-spanner) if one normalizes by the min-weight $(2f-1)$-EFT connectivity preserver. But if one normalizes by the min-weight $2f$-EFT connectivity preserver, then we show that the lightness is bounded by just $O(f^{1/2})$ times the non-fault tolerant lightness (roughly $n^{1/k}$, for a $(1+ε)(2k-1)$-spanner).

The restoration lemma is a classic result by Afek, Bremler-Barr, Kaplan, Cohen, and Merritt [PODC '01], which relates the structure of shortest paths in a graph $G$ before and after some edges in the graph fail. Their work shows that, after one edge failure, any replacement shortest path avoiding this failing edge can be partitioned into two pre-failure shortest paths. More generally, this implies an additive tradeoff between fault tolerance and subpath count: for any $f, k$, we can partition any $f$-edge-failure replacement shortest path into $k+1$ subpaths which are each an $(f-k)$-edge-failure replacement shortest path. This generalized result has found applications in routing, graph algorithms, fault tolerant network design, and more. Our main result improves this to a multiplicative tradeoff between fault tolerance and subpath count. We show that for all $f, k$, any $f$-edge-failure replacement path can be partitioned into $O(k)$ subpaths that are each an $(f/k)$-edge-failure replacement path. We also show an asymptotically matching lower bound. In particular, our results imply that the original restoration lemma is exactly tight in the case $k=1$, but can be significantly improved for larger $k$. We also show an extension of this result to weighted input graphs, and we give efficient algorithms that compute path decompositions satisfying our improved restoration lemmas.

In 2016, a breakthrough result of Chechik and Wulff-Nilsen [SODA '16] established that every $n$-node graph $G$ has a $(1+\varepsilon)(2k-1)$-spanner of lightness $O_{\varepsilon}(n^{1/k})$, and recent followup work by Le and Solomon [STOC '23] generalized the proof strategy and improved the dependence on $\varepsilon$. We give a new proof of this result, with the improved $\varepsilon$-dependence. Our proof is a direct analysis of the often-studied greedy spanner, and can be viewed as an extension of the folklore Moore bounds used to analyze spanner sparsity.

A classic 1993 paper by Althőfer et al. proved a tight reduction from spanners, emulators, and distance oracles to the extremal function $γ$ of high-girth graphs. This paper initiated a large body of work in network design, in which problems are attacked by reduction to $γ$ or the analogous extremal function for other girth concepts. In this paper, we introduce and study a new girth concept that we call the bridge girth of path systems, and we show that it can be used to significantly expand and improve this web of connections between girth problems and network design. We prove two kinds of results: 1) We write the maximum possible size of an $n$-node, $p$-path system with bridge girth $>k$ as $β(n, p, k)$, and we write a certain variant for "ordered" path systems as $β^*(n, p, k)$. We identify several arguments in the literature that implicitly show upper or lower bounds on $β, β^*$, and we provide some polynomially improvements to these bounds. In particular, we construct a tight lower bound for $β(n, p, 2)$, and we polynomially improve the upper bounds for $β(n, p, 4)$ and $β^*(n, p, \infty)$. 2) We show that many state-of-the-art results in network design can be recovered or improved via black-box reductions to $β$ or $β^*$. Examples include bounds for distance/reachability preservers, exact hopsets, shortcut sets, the flow-cut gaps for directed multicut and sparsest cut, an integrality gap for directed Steiner forest. We believe that the concept of bridge girth can lead to a stronger and more organized map of the research area. Towards this, we leave many open problems, related to both bridge girth reductions and extremal bounds on the size of path systems with high bridge girth.

Recent work has established that, for every positive integer $k$, every $n$-node graph has a $(2k-1)$-spanner on $O(f^{1-1/k} n^{1+1/k})$ edges that is resilient to $f$ edge or vertex faults. For vertex faults, this bound is tight. However, the case of edge faults is not as well understood: the best known lower bound for general $k$ is $Ω(f^{\frac12 - \frac{1}{2k}} n^{1+1/k} +fn)$. Our main result is to nearly close this gap with an improved upper bound, thus separating the cases of edge and vertex faults. For odd $k$, our new upper bound is $O_k(f^{\frac12 - \frac{1}{2k}} n^{1+1/k} + fn)$, which is tight up to hidden $poly(k)$ factors. For even $k$, our new upper bound is $O_k(f^{1/2} n^{1+1/k} +fn)$, which leaves a gap of $poly(k) f^{1/(2k)}$. Our proof is an analysis of the fault-tolerant greedy algorithm, which requires exponential time, but we also show that there is a polynomial-time algorithm which creates edge fault tolerant spanners that are larger only by factors of $k$.

A \emph{spanner} of a graph $G$ is a subgraph $H$ that approximately preserves shortest path distances in $G$. Spanners are commonly applied to compress computation on metric spaces corresponding to weighted input graphs. Classic spanner constructions can seamlessly handle edge weights, so long as error is measured \emph{multiplicatively}. In this work, we investigate whether one can similarly extend constructions of spanners with purely \emph{additive} error to weighted graphs. These extensions are not immediate, due to a key lemma about the size of shortest path neighborhoods that fails for weighted graphs. Despite this, we recover a suitable amortized version, which lets us prove direct extensions of classic $+2$ and $+4$ unweighted spanners (both all-pairs and pairwise) to $+2W$ and $+4W$ weighted spanners, where $W$ is the maximum edge weight. Specifically, we show that a weighted graph $G$ contains all-pairs (pairwise) $+2W$ and $+4W$ weighted spanners of size $O(n^{3/2})$ and $\widetilde{O}(n^{7/5})$ ($O(np^{1/3})$ and $O(np^{2/7})$) respectively. For a technical reason, the $+6$ unweighted spanner becomes a $+8W$ weighted spanner; closing this error gap is an interesting remaining open problem. That is, we show that $G$ contains all-pairs (pairwise) $+8W$ weighted spanners of size $O(n^{4/3})$ ($O(np^{1/4})$).

We consider problems of the following type: given a graph $G$, how many edges are needed in the worst case for a sparse subgraph $H$ that approximately preserves distances between a given set of node pairs $P$? Examples include pairwise spanners, distance preservers, reachability preservers, etc. There has been a trend in the area of simple constructions based on the hitting set technique, followed by somewhat more complicated constructions that improve over the bounds obtained from hitting sets by roughly a $\log$ factor. In this note, we point out that the simpler constructions based on hitting sets don't actually need an extra $\log$ factor in the first place. This simplifies and unifies a few proofs in the area, and it improves the size of the $+4$ pairwise spanner from $\widetilde{O}(np^{2/7})$ [Kavitha Th. Comp. Sys. '17] to $O(np^{2/7})$.

We prove algorithmic weak and \Szemeredi{} regularity lemmas for several classes of sparse graphs in the literature, for which only weak regularity lemmas were previously known. These include core-dense graphs, low threshold rank graphs, and (a version of) $L^p$ upper regular graphs. More precisely, we define \emph{cut pseudorandom graphs}, we prove our regularity lemmas for these graphs, and then we show that cut pseudorandomness captures all of the above graph classes as special cases. The core of our approach is an abstracted matrix decomposition, roughly following Frieze and Kannan [Combinatorica '99] and \Lovasz{} and Szegedy [Geom.\ Func.\ Anal.\ '07], which can be computed by a simple algorithm by Charikar [AAC0 '00]. This gives rise to the class of cut pseudorandom graphs, and using work of Oveis Gharan and Trevisan [TOC '15], it also implies new PTASes for MAX-CUT, MAX-BISECTION, MIN-BISECTION for a significantly expanded class of input graphs. (It is NP Hard to get PTASes for these graphs in general.)

In many combinatorial games, one can prove that the first player wins under best play using a simple but non-constructive argument called strategy-stealing. This work is about the complexity behind these proofs: how hard is it to actually find a winning move in a game, when you know by strategy-stealing that one exists? We prove that this problem is PSPACE-hard already for Minimum Poset Games and Symmetric Maker-Maker Games, which are simple classes of games that capture two of the main types of strategy-stealing arguments in the current literature.

This tutorial review provides a guiding reference to researchers who want to have an overview of the large body of literature about graph spanners. It reviews the current literature covering various research streams about graph spanners, such as different formulations, sparsity and lightness results, computational complexity, dynamic algorithms, and applications. As an additional contribution, we offer a list of open problems on graph spanners.

We give a short and easy upper bound on the worst-case size of fault tolerant spanners, which improves on all prior work and is fully optimal at least in the setting of vertex faults.

This paper develops a structural theory of unique shortest paths in real-weighted graphs. Our main goal is to characterize exactly which sets of node sequences, which we call path systems, can be realized as unique shortest paths in a graph with arbitrary real edge weights. We say that such a path system is strongly metrizable. An easy fact implicit in the literature is that a strongly metrizable path system must be consistent, meaning that no two of its paths may intersect, split apart, and then intersect again. Our main result characterizes strong metrizability via some new forbidden intersection patterns along these lines. In other words, we describe a family of forbidden patterns beyond consistency, and we prove that a path system is strongly metrizable if and only if it is consistent and it avoids all of the patterns in this family. We offer separate (but closely related) characterizations in this way for the settings of directed, undirected, and directed acyclic graphs. Our characterizations are based on a new connection between shortest paths and topology; in particular, our new forbidden patterns are in natural correspondence with two-colored topological $2$-manifolds, which we visualize as polyhedra. We believe that this connection may be of independent interest, and we further show that it implies some additional structural corollaries that seem to suggest new and possibly deep-rooted connections between these areas.

We abstract and study \emph{reachability preservers}, a graph-theoretic primitive that has been implicit in prior work on network design. Given a directed graph $G = (V, E)$ and a set of \emph{demand pairs} $P \subseteq V \times V$, a reachability preserver is a sparse subgraph $H$ that preserves reachability between all demand pairs. Our first contribution is a series of extremal bounds on the size of reachability preservers. Our main result states that, for an $n$-node graph and demand pairs of the form $P \subseteq S \times V$ for a small node subset $S$, there is always a reachability preserver on $O(n+\sqrt{n |P| |S|})$ edges. We additionally give a lower bound construction demonstrating that this upper bound characterizes the settings in which $O(n)$ size reachability preservers are generally possible, in a large range of parameters. The second contribution of this paper is a new connection between extremal graph sparsification results and classical Steiner Network Design problems. Surprisingly, prior to this work, the osmosis of techniques between these two fields had been superficial. This allows us to improve the state of the art approximation algorithms for the most basic Steiner-type problem in directed graphs from the $O(n^{0.6+\varepsilon})$ of Chlamatac, Dinitz, Kortsarz, and Laekhanukit (SODA'17) to $O(n^{4/7+\varepsilon})$.

A $k$-spanner of a graph $G$ is a sparse subgraph $H$ whose shortest path distances match those of $G$ up to a multiplicative error $k$. In this paper we study spanners that are resistant to faults. A subgraph $H \subseteq G$ is an $f$ vertex fault tolerant (VFT) $k$-spanner if $H \setminus F$ is a $k$-spanner of $G \setminus F$ for any small set $F$ of $f$ vertices that might "fail." One of the main questions in the area is: what is the minimum size of an $f$ fault tolerant $k$-spanner that holds for all $n$ node graphs (as a function of $f$, $k$ and $n$)? This question was first studied in the context of geometric graphs [Levcopoulos et al. STOC '98, Czumaj and Zhao SoCG '03] and has more recently been considered in general undirected graphs [Chechik et al. STOC '09, Dinitz and Krauthgamer PODC '11]. In this paper, we settle the question of the optimal size of a VFT spanner, in the setting where the stretch factor $k$ is fixed. Specifically, we prove that every (undirected, possibly weighted) $n$-node graph $G$ has a $(2k-1)$-spanner resilient to $f$ vertex faults with $O_k(f^{1 - 1/k} n^{1 + 1/k})$ edges, and this is fully optimal (unless the famous Erdos Girth Conjecture is false). Our lower bound even generalizes to imply that no data structure capable of approximating $dist_{G \setminus F}(s, t)$ similarly can beat the space usage of our spanner in the worst case. We also consider the edge fault tolerant (EFT) model, defined analogously with edge failures rather than vertex failures. We show that the same spanner upper bound applies in this setting. Our data structure lower bound extends to the case $k=2$ (and hence we close the EFT problem for $3$-approximations), but it falls to $Ω(f^{1/2 - 1/(2k)} \cdot n^{1 + 1/k})$ for $k \ge 3$. We leave it as an open problem to close this gap.

Spanners, emulators, and approximate distance oracles can be viewed as lossy compression schemes that represent an unweighted graph metric in small space, say $\tilde{O}(n^{1+δ})$ bits. There is an inherent tradeoff between the sparsity parameter $δ$ and the stretch function $f$ of the compression scheme, but the qualitative nature of this tradeoff has remained a persistent open problem. In this paper we show that the recent additive spanner lower bound of Abboud and Bodwin is just the first step in a hierarchy of lower bounds that fully characterize the asymptotic behavior of the optimal stretch function $f$ as a function of $δ\in (0,1/3)$. Specifically, for any integer $k\ge 2$, any compression scheme with size $O(n^{1+\frac{1}{2^k-1} - ε})$ has a sublinear additive stretch function $f$: $$f(d) = d + Ω(d^{1-\frac{1}{k}}).$$ This lower bound matches Thorup and Zwick's (2006) construction of sublinear additive emulators. It also shows that Elkin and Peleg's $(1+ε,β)$-spanners have an essentially optimal tradeoff between $δ,ε,$ and $β$, and that the sublinear additive spanners of Pettie (2009) and Chechik (2013) are not too far from optimal. To complement these lower bounds we present a new construction of $(1+ε, O(k/ε)^{k-1})$-spanners with size $O((k/ε)^{h_k} kn^{1+\frac{1}{2^{k+1}-1}})$, where $h_k < 3/4$. This size bound improves on the spanners of Elkin and Peleg (2004), Thorup and Zwick (2006), and Pettie (2009). According to our lower bounds neither the size nor stretch function can be substantially improved.