arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Harrie Hendriks

3 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
Tomaszewski's problem on randomly signed sums, revisited
Published in Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 28:2, #P2.35, 2021 • View PublicationBIB
Let $v_1$, $v_2$, ..., $v_n$ be real numbers whose squares add up to 1. Consider the $2^n$ signed sums of the form $S = \sum \pm v_i$. Boppana and Holzman (2017) proved that at least 13/32 of these sums satisfy $|S| \le 1$. Here we improve their bound to $0.427685$.
2020-03-05 v2
An improvement of the Boppana-Holzman bound for Rademacher random variables
Let $v_1,v_2,...,v_n$ be real numbers whose squares add up to $1$. Consider the $2^n$ signed sums of the form $S=\sum_{i=1}^n \pm v_i.$ Holzman and Kleitman (1992) proved that at least $\frac38=0.375$ of these sums satisfy $|S|\leq 1.$ By using bounds for appropriate moments of $S,$ Boppana and Holzman (2017) were able to improve the bound to $\frac{13}{32}=0.40625$ and even a bit better to $\frac{13}{32}+9\times10^{-6}.$ By following their approach, but using a key result of Bentkus and Dzindzalieta (2015), we will drastically improve (by more than 5\%) the latter barrier $\frac{13}{32}$ to $\frac{1}{2}-\frac{Φ(-2)}{4Φ(-\sqrt{2})}\approx 0.42768.$
Linear combinations of Rademacher random variables
For a fixed unit vector $a=(a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n)\in S^{n-1}$, we consider the $2^n$ sign vectors $\varepsilon=(\varepsilon^1,\varepsilon^2,\ldots,\varepsilon^n)\in \{+1,-1\}^n$ and the corresponding scalar products $\varepsilon\cdot a=\sum_{i=1}^n \varepsilon^ia_i$. In this paper we will solve for $n=1,2,\ldots,9$ an old conjecture stating that of the $2^n$ sums of the form $\sum\pm a_i$ it is impossible that there are more with $|\sum_{i=1}^n \pm a_i|>1$ than there are with $|\sum_{i=1}^n \pm a_i|\leq1$. Although the problem has been solved completely in case the $a_i$'s are equal, the more general problem with possible non-equal $a_i$'s remains open for values of $n\geq 10$. The present method can also be used for $n\geq 10$, but unfortunately the technical difficulties seem to grow exponentially with $n$ and no "induction type of argument" has been found. The conjecture has an appealing reformulation in probability theory and in geometry. In probability theory the results lead to upper bounds which are much better than for instance Chebyshevnequalities.