arXiv++ Combinatorics

The online Ramsey game for graphs $G$ and $H$ is played on the infinite complete graph $K_\mathbb{N}$. In each round, Builder chooses an edge, and Painter colors it red or blue. The online Ramsey number $\tilde{r}(G,H)$ is the smallest integer $t$ for which Builder has a strategy guaranteeing a red copy of $G$ or a blue copy of $H$ within $t$ rounds. For every fixed integer $k\ge4$, the best-known lower bounds for $\tilde{r}(K_{1,k},P_n)$ and $\tilde{r}(K_{1,k},C_n)$ are $\left(\frac{k+3}{4}+o(1)\right)n$ as $n\to\infty$. We improve the corresponding asymptotic upper bounds from $(k+o(1))n$ to $\left(\frac{2k+4}{5}+o(1)\right)n$ as $n\to\infty$.

The online Ramsey game for graphs $G$ and $H$ is played on the infinite complete graph $K_\mathbb{N}$. Each round, Builder chooses an edge, and Painter colors it red or blue. The online Ramsey number $\tilde{r}(G,H)$ is the smallest integer $t$ for which Builder has a strategy that guarantees a red copy of $G$ or a blue copy of $H$ in at most $t$ rounds. In this paper, we prove that for every positive integer $k$, there is a constant $L$ such that $\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\tilde{r}(P_k,P_n)}{n}=\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\tilde{r}(P_k,C_n)}{n}=L$.

We study the online coloring of $σ$-interval graphs which are interval graphs where the interval lengths are between 1 and $σ$ and 2-count interval graphs which are interval graphs that require at most $2$ distinct interval lengths. For online $σ$-interval graph coloring, we focus on online algorithms that do not have knowledge of the interval representation. The Kierstead-Trotter algorithm has competitive ratio 3 for all $σ$ and no online algorithm has competitive ratio better than 2, even for $σ=1$. In this paper, we show that for every $ε>0$, there is a $σ>1$ such that there is no online algorithm for $σ$-interval coloring with competitive ratio less than $3-ε$. Our strategy also improves the best known lower bounds for the greedy algorithm First-Fit for many values of $σ$. For online 2-count interval graph coloring, we analyze the performance of First-Fit and algorithms under various scenarios. We consider algorithms that receive the interval representation as input and algorithms that do not. We also consider algorithms that have prior knowledge of the interval lengths and algorithms that do not. We provide non-trivial lower bounds for each of the four cases. In particular, we show that there is no online algorithm with competitive ratio less than $2.5$ when the interval lengths are known, there is no online algorithm with competitive ratio less than $2$ when the interval representation is known, and there is no online algorithm with competitive ratio less than $1.75$ when both the interval lengths and interval representation are known.

We define the problem as a two-player game between Algorithm and Builder. The game is played in rounds. Each round, Builder presents an interval that is neither contained in nor contains any previously presented interval. Algorithm immediately and irrevocably assigns the interval a color that has not been assigned to any interval intersecting it. The set of intervals form an interval representation for a unit interval graph and the colors form a proper coloring of that graph. For every positive integer $ω$, we define the value $R(ω)$ as the maximum number of colors for which Builder has a strategy that forces Algorithm to use $R(ω)$ colors with the restriction that the unit interval graph constructed cannot contain a clique of size $ω+1$. In 1981, Chrobak and Ślusarek showed that $R(ω)\leq2ω-1$. In 2005, Epstein and Levy showed that $R(ω)\geq\lfloor{3ω/2\rfloor}$. This problem remained unsolved for $ω\geq 3$. In 2023, Biró and Curbelo showed that $R(3)=5$. In this paper, we show that $R(4)=7$

An on-line chain partitioning algorithm receives a poset, one element at a time, and irrevocably assigns the element to one of the chains in the partition. The on-line chain partitioning problem involves finding the minimal number of chains needed by an optimal on-line algorithm. Chrobak and Ślusarek considered variants of the on-line chain partitioning problem in which the elements are presented as intervals and intersecting intervals are incomparable. They constructed an on-line algorithm which uses at most $3w-2$ chains, where $w$ is the width of the interval order, and showed that this algorithm is optimal. They also considered the problem restricted to intervals of unit-length and while they showed that first-fit needs at most $2w-1$ chains, over $30$ years later, it remains unknown whether a more optimal algorithm exists. In this paper, we improve upon previously known bounds and show that any on-line algorithm can be forced to use $\lceil\frac{3}{2}w\rceil$ chains to partition a semi-order presented in the form of its unit-interval representation. As a consequence, we completely solve the problem for $w=3$.

An on-line chain partitioning algorithm receives a poset, one element at a time, and irrevocably assigns the element to one of the chains. Over 30 years ago, Szemerédi proved that any on-line algorithm could be forced to use $\binom{w+1}{2}$ chains to partition a poset of width $w$. The maximum number of chains that can be forced on any on-line algorithm remains unknown. In a survey paper by Bosek et al., it is shown that Szemerédi's argument could be improved to obtain a lower bound almost twice as good. Variants of the problem were considered where the class is restricted to posets of bounded dimension or where the poset is presented via a realizer of size $d$. In this paper, we prove two results. First, we prove that any on-line algorithm can be forced to use $(2-o(1))\binom{w+1}{2}$ chains to partition a $2$-dimensional poset of width $w$. Second, we prove that any on-line algorithm can be forced to use $(2-\frac{1}{d-1}-o(1))\binom{w+1}{2}$ chains to partition a poset of width $w$ presented via a realizer of size $d$.