arXiv++ Combinatorics

We show that given a monadically stable theory $T$, a sufficiently saturated $\mathbf M \models T$, and a coherent system of probability measures on the $σ$-algebras generated by parameter-definable sets of $\mathbf M$ in each dimension, we may produce a totally Borel $\mathbf B \prec \mathbf M$ realizing these measures. Our main application is to prove that every FO-convergent sequence of structures (with countable signature) from a monadically stable class admits a modeling limit. As another consequence, we prove a Borel removal lemma for monadically stable Lebesgue relational structures.

We prove that, on bounded expansion classes, every first-order formula with modulo counting is equivalent, in a linear-time computable monadic expansion, to an existential first-order formula. As a consequence, we derive, on bounded expansion classes, that first-order transductions with modulo counting have the same encoding power as existential first-order transductions. Also, modulo-counting first-order model checking and computation of the size of sets definable in modulo-counting first-order logic can be achieved in linear time on bounded expansion classes. As an application, we prove that a class has structurally bounded expansion if and only if it is a class of bounded depth vertex-minors of graphs in a bounded expansion class. We also show how our results can be used to implement fast matrix calculus on bounded expansion matrices over a finite field.

In this paper we discuss analogs of Füredi-Hajnal and Stanley-Wilf conjectures for $t$-dimensional matrices with $t>2$.

$χ$-bounded classes are studied here in the context of star colorings and more generally $χ_p$-colorings. This leads to natural extensions of the notion of bounded expansion class and to structural characterization of these. In this paper we solve two conjectures related to star coloring boundedness. One of the conjectures is disproved and in fact we determine which weakening holds true. We give structural characterizations of (strong and weak) $χ_p$-bounded classes. On the way, we generalize a result of Wood relating the chromatic number of a graph to the star chromatic number of its $1$-subdivision. As an application of our characterizations, among other things, we show that for every odd integer $g>3$ even hole-free graphs $G$ contain at most $\varphi(g,ω(G))\,|G|$ holes of length $g$.

In this note we characterize, within the framework of the theory of finite set, those categories of graphs that are {\em algebraic universal} in the sense that every concrete category embeds in them. The proof of the characterization is based on the sparse--dense dichotomy and its model theoretic equivalent.

A sequence of graphs is FO-convergent if the probability of satisfaction of every first-order formula converges. A graph modeling is a graph, whose domain is a standard probability space, with the property that every definable set is Borel. It was known that FO-convergent sequence of graphs do not always admit a modeling limit, and it was conjectured that this is the case if the graphs in the sequence are sufficiently sparse. Precisely, two conjectures were proposed: * If a FO-convergent sequence of graphs is residual, that is if for every integer $d$ the maximum relative size of a ball of radius $d$ in the graphs of the sequence tends to zero, then the sequence has a modeling limit. * A monotone class of graphs $\mathcal C$ has the property that every FO-convergent sequence of graphs from $\mathcal C$ has a modeling limit if and only if $\mathcal C$ is nowhere dense, that is if and only if for each integer $p$ there is $N(p)$ such that no graph in $\mathcal C$ contains the $p$th subdivision of a complete graph on $N(p)$ vertices as a subgraph.

In this paper we consider a simple algebraic structure --- sets with a single endofunction. We shall see that from the point of view of limits, even this simplest case is both interesting and difficult. Nevertheless we obtain the shape of limit objects in the full generality, and we prove the inverse theorem in the easiest case of quantifier-free limits.