Papers by Jakub Teska
4 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
The number of abundant elements in union-closed families without small sets
We let $\mathcal{F}$ be a finite family of sets closed under taking unions and $\emptyset \not \in \mathcal{F}$, and call an element abundant if it belongs to more than half of the sets of $\mathcal{F}$. In this notation, the classical Frankl's conjecture (1979) asserts that $\mathcal{F}$ has an abundant element. As possible strengthenings, Poonen (1992) conjectured that if $\mathcal{F}$ has precisely one abundant element, then this element belongs to each set of $\mathcal{F}$, and Cui and Hu (2019) investigated whether $\mathcal{F}$ has at least $k$ abundant elements if a smallest set of $\mathcal{F}$ is of size at least $k$. Cui and Hu conjectured that this holds for $k = 2$ and asked whether this also holds for the cases $k = 3$ and $k > \frac{n}{2}$ where $n$ is the size of the largest set of $\mathcal{F}$.
We show that $\mathcal{F}$ has at least $k$ abundant elements if $k \geq n - 3$, and that $\mathcal{F}$ has at least $k - 1$ abundant elements if $k = n - 4$, and we construct a union-closed family with precisely $k - 1$ abundant elements for every $k$ and $n$ satisfying $n - 4 \geq k \geq 3$ and $n \geq 9$ (and for $k = 3$ and $n = 8$). We also note that $\mathcal{F}$ always has at least $\min \{ n, 2k - n + 1 \}$ abundant elements. On the other hand, we construct a union-closed family with precisely two abundant elements for every $k$ and $n$ satisfying $n \geq \max \{ 3, 5k-4 \}$. Lastly, we show that Cui and Hu's conjecture for $k = 2$ stands between Frankl's conjecture and Poonen's conjecture.
Hamiltonian properties in generalized lexicographic products
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
The lexicographic product $G[H]$ of two graphs $G$ and $H$ is obtained from $G$ by replacing each vertex with a copy of $H$ and adding all edges between any pair of copies corresponding to adjacent vertices of $G$. We consider also the generalized lexicographic product such that we replace each vertex of $G$ with arbitrary graph on the same number of vertices. We present sufficient and necessary conditions for traceability, hamiltonicity and hamiltonian connectivity of $G[H]$ if $G$ is a path and hence we improved and extended results in M. Kriesell, A Note on Hamiltonian Cycles in Lexicographical Products.
Trestles in the squares of graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We show that the square of every connected $S(K_{1,4})$-free graph satisfying a matching condition has a $2$-connected spanning subgraph of maximum degree at most~$3$. Furthermore, we characterise trees whose square has a $2$-connected spanning subgraph of maximum degree at most~$k$. This generalises the results on $S(K_{1,3})$-free graphs of Henry and Vogler (1985) and Harary and Schwenk (1971), respectively.
Bounding the distance among longest paths in a connected graph
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
It is easy to see that in a connected graph any 2 longest paths have a vertex in common. For k>=7, Skupien in [7] obtained a connected graph in which some k longest paths have no common vertex, but every k-1 longest paths have a common vertex. It is not known whether every 3 longest paths in a connected graph have a common vertex and similarly for 4, 5, and 6 longest path. In [5] the authors give an upper bound on distance among 3 longest paths in a connected graph. In this paper we give a similar upper bound on distance between 4 longest paths and also for k longest paths, in general.