arXiv++ Combinatorics

It is an elementary fact that the size of an orthogonal array of strength t on k factors must be a multiple of a certain number, say L_t, that depends on the orders of the factors. Thus L_t is a lower bound on the size of arrays of strength t on those factors, and is no larger than L_k, the size of the complete factorial design. We investigate the relationship between the numbers L_t, and two questions in particular: For what t is L_t < L_k? And when L_t = L_k, is the complete factorial design the only array of that size and strength t? Arrays are assumed to be mixed-level. We refer to an array of size less than L_k as a proper fraction. Guided by our main result, we construct a variety of mixed-level proper fractions of strength k-1 that also satisfy a certain group-theoretic condition.

Xu and Wu (2001) defined the \emph{generalized wordlength pattern} $(A_1, ..., A_k)$ of an arbitrary fractional factorial design (or orthogonal array) on $k$ factors. They gave a coding-theoretic proof of the property that the design has strength $t$ if and only if $A_1 = ... = A_t = 0$. The quantities $A_i$ are defined in terms of characters of cyclic groups, and so one might seek a direct character-theoretic proof of this result. We give such a proof, in which the specific group structure (such as cyclicity) plays essentially no role. Nonabelian groups can be used if the counting function of the design satisfies one assumption, as illustrated by a couple of examples.