Papers by Jianing Liu
2 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Extremal arborescences in graph orientations
In this paper, we study the extremal number of arborescences over orientations of a fixed graph. We prove that every alternating orientation of a plane Eulerian multigraph minimizes the rooted arborescence count among its Eulerian orientations. We also prove that every tournament of odd order maximizing the total number of arborescences is regular, and hence Eulerian. These results resolve Conjectures 5.1 and 5.4 of Bandekar et al. We further establish upper bounds for arborescence counts in orientations of complete bipartite graphs and characterize the orientations attaining them.
Weak rainbow saturation numbers of paths, stars and cycles
An edge-colored graph is \emph{rainbow} if all of its edges receive distinct colors. For a fixed graph $H$, an edge-colored graph $F$ is called weakly $H$-rainbow saturated if there exists an ordering $e_1,e_2,\ldots,e_{|E(\bar{F})|}$ of $E(\bar{F})$ such that, for any edge coloring $c$ of $E(\bar{F})$ with $c(e_i)\neq c(e_j)$, there is always a rainbow copy of $H$ that contains $e_i$ in $F+\{e_1,e_2,\ldots,e_i\}$. The \emph{weak rainbow saturation number} $\operatorname{rwsat}(n,H)$ is the minimum number of edges in a weakly $H$-rainbow saturated graph on $n$ vertices. Li, Ma, and Xie [JGT, 2025] showed that $\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{\operatorname{rwsat}(n,H)}{n}$ exists for every nonempty graph $H$.
Paths and stars attain, respectively, the minimum and maximum ordinary weak saturation numbers among all trees of the same order. We determine their weak rainbow saturation numbers exactly. For all $\ell>30$, we show that $$ \ell+1=\s(n,P_\ell)< \s(n,S_\ell)=\binom{\ell}{2}-1$$ where $P_\ell$ and $S_\ell$ denote the path and star on $\ell$ vertices, respectively. Thus, their dependence on $\ell$ is linear for paths and quadratic for stars. We then focus on cycles. Li, Ma, and Xie asked whether $\operatorname{rwsat}(n,C_\ell)$ has leading term $\frac32n$ for every $\ell\ge4$. We answer this question negatively by giving an explicit construction showing that, for every $\ell\ge4$ and all sufficiently large $n$, $$\s(n,C_\ell)< \frac{\ell}{\ell-1}n+c_\ell,$$ where $c_\ell$ depends only on $\ell$. Since $\frac{\ell}{\ell-1}<\frac32$, this strictly improves the proposed leading coefficient for every cycle $C_\ell$ with $\ell\ge4$.