arXiv++ Combinatorics

Phylogenetic trees are rooted trees with branch lengths that record genetic divergence or elapsed time, and quantifying differences between them is central to a wide range of evolutionary and epidemiological analyses. Graph-polynomial encodings of rooted trees provide an accurate, interpretable, and computationally efficient way to compare tree shapes, but existing polynomial encodings must be paired with auxiliary structures to study rooted trees with branch lengths. We introduce a bivariate polynomial encoding that incorporates branch lengths directly into a recursive computation from the leaf vertices to the root vertex of a tree. We prove that, for rooted trees with branch lengths and no vertices of degree two, which include all standard phylogenetic trees, two trees have the same polynomial if and only if their underlying unlabeled trees are isomorphic and the branch lengths of corresponding edges are equal. We apply the polynomial encoding to three published HIV-1 phylogenies sampled in different epidemiological settings and show that it accurately separates the three datasets based on their tree topologies and branch lengths, outperforming previous polynomial-based approaches for analyzing rooted trees with branch lengths.

We study the enumeration of spinal tree-child phylogenetic networks, a rigid family of tree-child networks in which all internal vertices lie on a single root--to--leaf path. We provide two complementary combinatorial frameworks. First, we introduce a word model: unlabeled spinal networks correspond to a suitable class of restricted words with fixed multiplicities, taken modulo a simple relabeling equivalence, which yields an explicit closed enumeration. Second, we develop a symbolic-method approach based on a marked version of trees that admits a clean recursive specification; its boxed-product translation leads to a solvable bivariate generating function and a direct derivation of the coefficients.

In evolutionary biology, phylogenetic networks are now widely used to represent the historical relationships between species and population, when this history includes reticulation events such as hybridization, gene flow and admixture between populations. Semidirected phylogenetic networks are appropriate models when the direction of some edges and the root position are not identifiable from data. Comparing semidirected networks is important in many applications. For rooted and directed networks, a $μ$-representation was originally introduced to distinguish tree-child networks, and has since been extended in two different directions: to the larger class of orchard directed networks by adding an extra component that counts paths to reticulations; and to semidirected networks, through an edge-based variant. However, the latter does not provide a distance between semidirected and orchard networks. We introduce here a new edge-based $μ$-representation capable of distinguishing distinct orchard binary semidirected networks. For this class, we provide a reconstruction algorithm and therefore obtain a true distance that is computable in polynomial time.

Invariants for complicated objects such as those arising in phylogenetics, whether they are invariants as matrices, polynomials, or other mathematical structures, are important tools for distinguishing and working with such objects. In this paper, we generalize a complete polynomial invariant on trees to a class of phylogenetic networks called separable networks, which will include orchard networks. Networks are becoming increasingly important for their ability to represent reticulation events, such as hybridization, in evolutionary history. We provide a function from the space of internally multi-labelled phylogenetic networks, a more generic graph structure than phylogenetic networks where the reticulations are also labelled, to a polynomial ring. We prove that the separability condition allows us to characterize, via the polynomial, the phylogenetic networks with the same number of leaves and same number of reticulations by considering their internally labelled versions. While the invariant for trees is a polynomial in Z[x_1,..., x_n,y] where n is the number of leaves, the invariant for internally multi-labelled phylogenetic networks is an element of Z[x_1,..., x_n,lambda_1,...,lambda_r,y], where r is the number of reticulations in the network. When the networks are considered without leaf labels the number of variables reduces to r+2.

The evolutionary relationships among organisms have traditionally been represented using rooted phylogenetic trees. However, due to reticulate processes such as hybridization or lateral gene transfer, evolution cannot always be adequately represented by a phylogenetic tree, and rooted phylogenetic networks that describe such complex processes have been introduced as a generalization of rooted phylogenetic trees. In fact, estimating rooted phylogenetic networks from genomic sequence data and analyzing their structural properties is one of the most important tasks in contemporary phylogenetics. Over the last two decades, several subclasses of rooted phylogenetic networks (characterized by certain structural constraints) have been introduced in the literature, either to model specific biological phenomena or to enable tractable mathematical and computational analyses. In the present manuscript, we provide a thorough review of these network classes, as well as provide a biological interpretation of the structural constraints underlying these networks where possible. In addition, we discuss how imposing structural constraints on the network topology can be used to address the scalability and identifiability challenges faced in the estimation of phylogenetic networks from empirical data.

Phylogenetic networks generalise phylogenetic trees and allow for the accurate representation of the evolutionary history of a set of present-day species whose past includes reticulate events such as hybridisation and lateral gene transfer. One way to obtain such a network is by starting with a (rooted) phylogenetic tree $T$, called a base tree, and adding arcs between arcs of $T$. The class of phylogenetic networks that can be obtained in this way is called tree-based networks and includes the prominent classes of tree-child and reticulation-visible networks. Initially defined for binary phylogenetic networks, tree-based networks naturally extend to arbitrary phylogenetic networks. In this paper, we generalise recent tree-based characterisations and associated proximity measures for binary phylogenetic networks to arbitrary phylogenetic networks. These characterisations are in terms of matchings in bipartite graphs, path partitions, and antichains. Some of the generalisations are straightforward to establish using the original approach, while others require a very different approach. Furthermore, for an arbitrary tree-based network $N$, we characterise the support trees of $N$, that is, the tree-based embeddings of $N$. We use this characterisation to give an explicit formula for the number of support trees of $N$ when $N$ is binary. This formula is written in terms of the components of a bipartite graph.