arXiv++ Combinatorics

In the localization game on a graph $G$, a team of cops searches for an invisible, mobile robber on $G$ by "probing" vertices; each probe tells the cops the distance from the probed vertex to the robber. The cops win if they can uniquely determine the robber's location. In this paper, we introduce a related game: the directional localization game. In this game, instead of probes returning distances, they return directions: when the cops probe a vertex $v$, the robber must respond with one or more neighbors of $v$ that lie on a shortest path from $v$ to the robber's location. The minimum number of cops needed to win this game on $G$ is the directional localization number of $G$. We study the directional localization game on several classes of graphs, including chordal graphs, Cartesian products, and incidence graphs of projective planes. We also bound the directional localization number of a graph $G$ in terms of the degeneracy and the treewidth of $G$.

In the classic game of Cops and Robbers, a team of cops pursues a robber through a graph. The traditional model of Cops and Robbers operates under the assumption that the cops know the robber's location at all times. Recently, however, there has been growing interest in models wherein the cops have only partial information about the robber's location. In this paper, we study the limited-visibility variant of Cops and Robbers, in which the cops only know the robber's position if some cop is within a fixed distance of the robber. For this variant of the game, we give bounds on the number of cops needed to capture a robber on Hamming graphs, and we use these results to settle several open problems posed by Clarke et al.