arXiv++ Combinatorics

In 1876 H. J. S. Smith defined an LCM matrix as follows: let S = {x_1, x_2, ..., x_n} be a set of positive integers. The LCM matrix [S] is the n $\times$ n matrix with lcm(x_i , x_j) as its ij entry. During the last 30 years singularity of LCM matrices has interested many authors. In 1992 Bourque and Ligh ended up conjecturing that if the GCD closedness of the set S (which means that gcd(x_i, x_j) $\in$ S for all i, j $\in$ {1, 2, . . . , n}), suffices to guarantee the invertibility of the matrix [S]. However, a few years later this conjecture was proven false first by Haukkanen et al. and then by Hong. It turned out that the conjecture holds only on GCD closed sets with at most 7 elements but not in general for larger sets. However, the given counterexamples did not give much insight on why does the conjecture fail exactly in the case when n=8. This situation was later improved in a couple of articles, where a new lattice theoretic approach was introduced (the method is based on the fact that because the set S is assumed to be GCD closed, the structure (S, |) actually forms a meet semilattice). For example, it has been shown that in the case when the set S has 8 elements and the matrix [S] is singular, there is only one option for the semilattice structure of (S, |), namely the cube structure. Since the cases up to n=8 have been thoroughly studied in various articles, the next natural step is to apply the methods to the case n=9. This was done by Altinisik and Altintaa as they consider the different lattice structures of (S, |) with nine elements that can result in a singular LCM matrix [S]. However, their investigation leaves two open questions, and the main purpose of this presentation is to provide solutions to them. We shall also give a new lattice theoretic proof for a result referred to as Sun's conjecture, which was originally proven by Hong via number theoretic approach.

Let $S=\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n\}$ be a finite set of distinct positive integers. Throughout this article we assume that the set $S$ is GCD closed. The LCM matrix $[S]$ of the set $S$ is defined to be the $n\times n$ matrix with $\mathrm{lcm}(x_i,x_j)$ as its $ij$ element. The famous Bourque-Ligh conjecture used to state that the LCM matrix of a GCD closed set $S$ is always invertible, but currently it is a well-known fact that any nontrivial LCM matrix is indefinite and under the right circumstances it can be even singular (even if the set $S$ is assumed to be GCD closed). However, not much more is known about the inertia of LCM matrices in general. The ultimate goal of this article is to improve this situation. Assuming that $S$ is a meet closed set we define an entirely new lattice-theoretic concept by saying that an element $x_i\in S$ generates a double-chain set in $S$ if the set $\mathrm{meetcl}(C_S(x_i))\setminus C_S(x_i)$ can be expressed as a union of two disjoint chains (here the set $C_S(x_i)$ consists of all the elements of the set $S$ that are covered by $x_i$ and $\mathrm{meetcl}(C_S(x_i))$ is the smallest meet closed subset of $S$ that contains the set $C_S(x_i)$). We then proceed by studying the values of the Möbius function on sets in which every element generates a double-chain set and use the properties of the Möbius function to explain why the Bourque-Ligh conjecture holds in so many cases and fails in certain very specific instances. After that we turn our attention to the inertia and see that in some cases it is possible to determine the inertia of an LCM matrix simply by looking at the lattice-theoretic structure of $(S,|)$ alone. Finally, we are going to show how to construct LCM matrices in which the majority of the eigenvalues is either negative or positive.

The invertibility of LCM matrices and their Hadamard powers have been studied a lot over the years by many authors. Bourque and Ligh conjectured in 1992 that the LCM matrix $[S]=[[x_i, x_j]]$ on any GCD closed set $S=\{x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n\}$ is invertible, but in 1997 this was proven false. However, currently there are many open conjectures concerning LCM matrices and their Hadamard powers presented by Hong. In this paper we utilize lattice-theoretic structures and the Möbius function to explain the singularity of classical LCM matrices and their Hadamard powers. At the same time we end up disproving some of Hong's conjectures. Elementary mathematical analysis is applied to prove that for most semilattice structures there exist a set $S=\{x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n\}$ of positive integers and a real number $α>0$ such that $S$ possesses this structure and the power LCM matrix $[[x_i, x_j]^α]$ is singular.