arXiv++ Combinatorics

Strassen founded the theory of the asymptotic spectrum of tensors to study the complexity of matrix multiplication. A central challenge in this theory is to explicitly construct new spectral points. In Crelle 1991, Strassen proposed the upper support functionals $ζ^θ$ as candidate spectral points, where $θ$ ranges over a triangle $Θ$. Recent progress, involving tools and ideas from quantum information theory (Christandl-Vrana-Zuiddam, STOC 2018, JAMS 2021) and convex optimization (Hirai, 2025), culminated in the proof that the upper support functionals are indeed spectral points over the complex numbers (Sakabe-Doğan-Walter, 2026). In this paper, we give an even clearer picture of the situation for support functionals when $θ$ lies along the edges of the triangle. We show that not only are these functionals spectral points, but that they are uniquely determined as spectral points by their behavior on matrix multiplication tensors. As our methods are algebraic, as a corollary this establishes for the first time the existence of nontrivial spectral points over arbitrary fields. As part of our argument, we show a close connection between the edge support functionals and Harder-Narasimhan filtrations from quiver representation theory. We thus show, using recent work in algorithmic invariant theory, that these support functionals can be computed in deterministic polynomial time. Other ingredients of our proof include a new criterion for abstractly characterizing asymptotic tensor ranks by spectral points, and a characterization of the edge support functionals in terms of matrix multiplication capacity. As another application of these tools, we prove the existence of spectral points for higher-mode tensors beyond those currently known.

For a matrix $M$ and a positive integer $r$, the rank $r$ rigidity of $M$ is the smallest number of entries of $M$ which one must change to make its rank at most $r$. There are many known applications of rigidity lower bounds to a variety of areas in complexity theory, but fewer known applications of rigidity upper bounds. In this paper, we use rigidity upper bounds to prove new upper bounds in a few different models of computation. Our results include: $\bullet$ For any $d> 1$, and over any field $\mathbb{F}$, the $N \times N$ Walsh-Hadamard transform has a depth-$d$ linear circuit of size $O(d \cdot N^{1 + 0.96/d})$. This circumvents a known lower bound of $Ω(d \cdot N^{1 + 1/d})$ for circuits with bounded coefficients over $\mathbb{C}$ by Pudlák (2000), by using coefficients of magnitude polynomial in $N$. Our construction also generalizes to linear transformations given by a Kronecker power of any fixed $2 \times 2$ matrix. $\bullet$ The $N \times N$ Walsh-Hadamard transform has a linear circuit of size $\leq (1.81 + o(1)) N \log_2 N$, improving on the bound of $\approx 1.88 N \log_2 N$ which one obtains from the standard fast Walsh-Hadamard transform. $\bullet$ A new rigidity upper bound, showing that the following classes of matrices are not rigid enough to prove circuit lower bounds using Valiant's approach: $-$ for any field $\mathbb{F}$ and any function $f : \{0,1\}^n \to \mathbb{F}$, the matrix $V_f \in \mathbb{F}^{2^n \times 2^n}$ given by, for any $x,y \in \{0,1\}^n$, $V_f[x,y] = f(x \wedge y)$, and $-$ for any field $\mathbb{F}$ and any fixed-size matrices $M_1, \ldots, M_n \in \mathbb{F}^{q \times q}$, the Kronecker product $M_1 \otimes M_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes M_n$. This generalizes recent results on non-rigidity, using a simpler approach which avoids needing the polynomial method.

The complexity of matrix multiplication is measured in terms of $ω$, the smallest real number such that two $n\times n$ matrices can be multiplied using $O(n^{ω+ε})$ field operations for all $ε>0$; the best bound until now is $ω<2.37287$ [Le Gall'14]. All bounds on $ω$ since 1986 have been obtained using the so-called laser method, a way to lower-bound the `value' of a tensor in designing matrix multiplication algorithms. The main result of this paper is a refinement of the laser method that improves the resulting value bound for most sufficiently large tensors. Thus, even before computing any specific values, it is clear that we achieve an improved bound on $ω$, and we indeed obtain the best bound on $ω$ to date: $$ω< 2.37286.$$ The improvement is of the same magnitude as the improvement that [Le Gall'14] obtained over the previous bound [Vassilevska W.'12]. Our improvement to the laser method is quite general, and we believe it will have further applications in arithmetic complexity.

In this work, we prove limitations on the known methods for designing matrix multiplication algorithms. Alman and Vassilevska Williams recently defined the Universal Method, which substantially generalizes all the known approaches including Strassen's Laser Method and Cohn and Umans' Group Theoretic Method. We prove concrete lower bounds on the algorithms one can design by applying the Universal Method to many different tensors. Our proofs use new tools for upper bounding the asymptotic slice rank of a wide range of tensors. Our main result is that the Universal method applied to any Coppersmith-Winograd tensor $CW_q$ cannot yield a bound on $ω$, the exponent of matrix multiplication, better than $2.16805$. By comparison, it was previously only known that the weaker `Galactic Method' applied to $CW_q$ could not achieve an exponent of $2$. We also study the Laser Method (which is, in principle, a highly special case of the Universal Method) and prove that it is "complete" for matrix multiplication algorithms: when it applies to a tensor $T$, it achieves $ω= 2$ if and only if it is possible for the Universal method applied to $T$ to achieve $ω= 2$. Hence, the Laser Method, which was originally used as an algorithmic tool, can also be seen as a lower bounding tool. For example, in their landmark paper, Coppersmith and Winograd achieved a bound of $ω\leq 2.376$, by applying the Laser Method to $CW_q$. By our result, the fact that they did not achieve $ω=2$ implies a lower bound on the Universal Method applied to $CW_q$. Indeed, if it were possible for the Universal Method applied to $CW_q$ to achieve $ω=2$, then Coppersmith and Winograd's application of the Laser Method would have achieved $ω=2$.

We show how to compute any symmetric Boolean function on $n$ variables over any field (as well as the integers) with a probabilistic polynomial of degree $O(\sqrt{n \log(1/ε)})$ and error at most $ε$. The degree dependence on $n$ and $ε$ is optimal, matching a lower bound of Razborov (1987) and Smolensky (1987) for the MAJORITY function. The proof is constructive: a low-degree polynomial can be efficiently sampled from the distribution. This polynomial construction is combined with other algebraic ideas to give the first subquadratic time algorithm for computing a (worst-case) batch of Hamming distances in superlogarithmic dimensions, exactly. To illustrate, let $c(n) : \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$. Suppose we are given a database $D$ of $n$ vectors in $\{0,1\}^{c(n) \log n}$ and a collection of $n$ query vectors $Q$ in the same dimension. For all $u \in Q$, we wish to compute a $v \in D$ with minimum Hamming distance from $u$. We solve this problem in $n^{2-1/O(c(n) \log^2 c(n))}$ randomized time. Hence, the problem is in "truly subquadratic" time for $O(\log n)$ dimensions, and in subquadratic time for $d = o((\log^2 n)/(\log \log n)^2)$. We apply the algorithm to computing pairs with maximum inner product, closest pair in $\ell_1$ for vectors with bounded integer entries, and pairs with maximum Jaccard coefficients.