arXiv++ Combinatorics

We introduce a Hamming-type angular function $$\mathrm{angle}_H(u,v):= \min_{c \in \mathbb{F}_q^n} d_H(u, cv)$$ on pairs of nonzero vectors in $\mathbb{F}_q^n$ and show that it satisfies all three metric axioms up to scalar multiplication. The function $\mathrm{angle}_H$ is invariant under nonzero scalar multiplication in either argument and therefore descends to a genuine integer-valued metric on the projective space $\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{F}_q^n)$. As a concrete application, we prove an \emph{angular} (or \emph{projective}) version of the unique-decoding theorem for linear codes: if $\mathrm{angle}_H(u, C\setminus\{0\}) < d/2$, where $d$ is the minimum distance of the linear code $C$, then the closest direction in $C$ to $u$ is unique up to nonzero scalar multiplication. We then discuss how this angular viewpoint relates to the proximity-gap programme for Reed--Solomon codes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to define an angle notion for vectors over finite fields and interpret it from several perspectives, including geometry, coding theory, and cryptography.

The Erdős--Rado sunflower problem admits two natural analogues in finite vector spaces, corresponding to two different ways of generalising the set-theoretic notion of a sunflower. The first, used by Ihringer and Kupavskii [FFA 110 (2026) 102746], requires the petals to be in general position over the kernel; the second, used in the subspace codes literature (cf.\ Etzion--Raviv [DAM 186 (2015) 87-97], Blokhuis--De Boeck--D'haeseleer [DCC 90 (2022) 2101-2111]), requires only that the kernel equals the pairwise intersection of distinct petals. We refer to the second version as a \emph{set-like sunflower}, following Ihringer and Kupavskii. In this note, we focus on the set-like setting. We observe that the constructions of Ihringer--Kupavskii, although correct under their (stronger) definition, do not yield set-like sunflower-free families: we exhibit explicit set-like sunflowers inside their Example~3.1. We then present a construction of set-like $s$-sunflower-free families of $k$-spaces, based on a manipulated version of the lifting construction. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic construction tailored to this setting.

The Grassmannian $\mathcal{G}_q(n,k)$ is the set of all $k$-dimensional subspaces of the vector space $\mathbb{F}_q^n$. Kötter and Kschischang showed that codes in Grassmannian space can be used for error-correction in random network coding. On the other hand, these codes are $q$-analogs of codes in the Johnson scheme, i.e., constant dimension codes. These codes of the Grassmannian $\mathcal{G}_q(n,k)$ also form a family of $q$-analogs of block designs and they are called subspace designs. In this paper, we examine one of the last families of $q$-analogs of block designs which was not considered before. This family, called subspace packings, is the $q$-analog of packings, and was considered recently for network coding solution for a family of multicast networks called the generalized combination networks. A subspace packing $t$-$(n,k,λ)_q$ is a set $\mathcal{S}$ of $k$-subspaces from $\mathcal{G}_q(n,k)$ such that each $t$-subspace of $\mathcal{G}_q(n,t)$ is contained in at most $λ$ elements of $\mathcal{S}$. The goal of this work is to consider the largest size of such subspace packings. We derive a sequence of lower and upper bounds on the maximum size of such packings, analyse these bounds, and identify the important problems for further research in this area.