arXiv++ Combinatorics

This paper introduces the notion of $(ι,q)$-critical graphs. The isolation number of a graph $G$, denoted by $ι(G)$ and also known as the vertex-edge domination number, is the minimum number of vertices in a set $D$ such that the subgraph induced by the vertices not in the closed neighbourhood of $D$ has no edges. A graph $G$ is $(ι,q)$-critical, $q \ge 1$, if the subdivision of any $q$ edges in $G$ gives a graph with isolation number greater than $ι(G)$ and there exists a set of $q-1$ edges such that subdividing them gives a graph with isolation number equal to $ι(G)$. We prove that for each integer $q \ge 1$ there exists a $(ι,q)$-critical graph, while for a given graph $G$, the admissible values of $q$ satisfy $1 \le q \le |E(G)| - 1$. In addition, we provide a general characterisation of $(ι,1)$-critical graphs as well as a constructive characterisation of $(ι,1)$-critical trees.

The $3$-path isolation number of a connected $n$-vertex graph $G$, denoted by $ι(G,P_3)$, is the size of a smallest subset $D$ of the vertex set of $G$ such that the closed neighbourhood $N[D]$ of $D$ in $G$ intersects each $3$-vertex path of $G$, meaning that no two edges of $G-N[D]$ intersect. Zhang and Wu proved that $ι(G,P_3) \leq 2n/7$ unless $G$ is a $3$-path or a $3$-cycle or a $6$-cycle. The bound is attained by infinitely many graphs having induced $6$-cycles. Huang, Zhang and Jin proved that if $G$ has no $6$-cycles, or $G$ has no induced $5$-cycles and no induced $6$-cycles, then $ι(G, P_3) \leq n/4$ unless $G$ is a $3$-path or a $3$-cycle or a $7$-cycle or an $11$-cycle. They asked if the bound still holds asymptotically for connected graphs having no induced $6$-cycles. More precisely, taking $f(n)$ to be the maximum value of $ι(G,P_3)$ over all connected $n$-vertex graphs $G$ having no induced $6$-cycles, their question is whether $\limsup_{n \to\infty}\frac{f(n)}{n} = \frac{1}{4}$. We verify this by proving that $f(n) = \left \lfloor (n+1)/4 \right \rfloor$. The proof hinges on further proving that if $G$ is such a graph and $ι(G, P_3) = (n+1)/4$, then $ι(G-v, P_3) < ι(G, P_3)$ for each vertex $v$ of $G$. This new idea promises to be of further use. We also prove that if the maximum degree of such a graph $G$ is at least $5$, then $ι(G,P_3) \leq n/4$.

The $3$-path isolation number of a connected $n$-vertex graph $G$, denoted by $ι(G,P_3)$, is the size of a smallest subset $D$ of the vertex set of $G$ such that the closed neighbourhood $N[D]$ of $D$ in $G$ intersects each $3$-vertex path of $G$, meaning that no two edges of $G-N[D]$ intersect. If $G$ is not a $3$-path or a $3$-cycle or a $6$-cycle, then $ι(G,P_3) \leq 2n/7$. This was proved by Zhang and Wu, and independently by Borg in a slightly extended form. The bound is attained by infinitely many graphs having induced $6$-cycles. Huang, Zhang and Jin showed that if $G$ has no $6$-cycles, or $G$ has no induced $5$-cycles and no induced $6$-cycles, then $ι(G,P_3) \leq n/4$ unless $G$ is a $3$-path or a $3$-cycle or a $7$-cycle or an $11$-cycle. They asked if the bound still holds asymptotically for connected graphs having no induced $6$-cycles. Thus, the problem essentially is whether induced $6$-cycles solely account for the difference between the two bounds. In this paper, we solve this problem for subcubic graphs, which need to be treated differently from other graphs. We show that if $G$ is subcubic and has no induced $6$-cycles, then $ι(G,P_3) \leq n/4$ unless $G$ is a copy of one of $12$ particular graphs whose orders are $3$, $7$, $11$ and $15$. The bound is sharp.

Given a set $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs, we call a copy of a graph in $\mathcal{F}$ an $\mathcal{F}$-graph. The $\mathcal{F}$-isolation number of a graph $G$, denoted by $ι(G,\mathcal{F})$, is the size of a smallest subset $D$ of the vertex set $V(G)$ such that the closed neighbourhood of $D$ intersects the vertex sets of the $\mathcal{F}$-graphs contained by $G$ (equivalently, $G - N[D]$ contains no $\mathcal{F}$-graph). Thus, $ι(G,\{K_1\})$ is the domination number of $G$. The second author showed that if $\mathcal{F}$ is the set of cycles and $G$ is a connected $n$-vertex graph that is not a triangle, then $ι(G,\mathcal{F}) \leq \left \lfloor \frac{n}{4} \right \rfloor$. This bound is attainable for every $n$ and solved a problem of Caro and Hansberg. A question that arises immediately is how much smaller an upper bound can be if $\mathcal{F} = \{C_k\}$ for some $k \geq 3$, where $C_k$ is a cycle of length $k$. The problem is to determine the smallest real number $c_k$ (if it exists) such that for some finite set $\mathcal{E}_k$ of graphs, $ι(G, \{C_k\}) \leq c_k |V(G)|$ for every connected graph $G$ that is not an $\mathcal{E}_k$-graph. The above-mentioned result yields $c_3 = \frac{1}{4}$ and $\mathcal{E}_3 = \{C_3\}$. The second author also showed that if $k \geq 5$ and $c_k$ exists, then $c_k \geq \frac{2}{2k + 1}$. We prove that $c_4 = \frac{1}{5}$ and determine $\mathcal{E}_4$, which consists of three $4$-vertex graphs and six $9$-vertex graphs. The $9$-vertex graphs in $\mathcal{E}_4$ were fully determined by means of a computer program. A method that has the potential of yielding similar results is introduced.