arXiv++ Combinatorics

We consider problems of finding a maximum size/weight $t$-matching without forbidden subgraphs in an undirected graph $G$ with the maximum degree bounded by $t+1$, where $t$ is an integer greater than $2$. Depending on the variant forbidden subgraphs denote certain subsets of $t$-regular complete partite subgraphs of $G$. A graph is complete partite if there exists a partition of its vertex set such that every pair of vertices from different sets is connected by an edge and vertices from the same set form an independent set. A clique $K_t$ and a bipartite clique $K_{t,t}$ are examples of complete partite graphs. These problems are natural generalizations of the triangle-free and square-free $2$-matching problems in subcubic graphs. In the weighted setting we assume that the weights of edges of $G$ are vertex-induced on every forbidden subgraph. We present simple and fast combinatorial algorithms for these problems. The presented algorithms are the first ones for the weighted versions, and for the unweighted ones, are faster than those known previously. Our approach relies on the use of gadgets with so-called half-edges. A half-edge of edge $e$ is, informally speaking, a half of $e$ containing exactly one of its endpoints.

In the maximum asymmetric traveling salesman problem (Max ATSP) we are given a complete directed graph with nonnegative weights on the edges and we wish to compute a traveling salesman tour of maximum weight. In this paper we give a fast combinatorial $\frac{7}{10}$-approximation algorithm for Max ATSP. It is based on techniques of {\em eliminating} and {\em diluting} problematic subgraphs with the aid of {\it half-edges} and a method of edge coloring. (A {\it half-edge} of edge $(u,v)$ is informally speaking "either a head or a tail of $(u,v)$".) A novel technique of {\em diluting} a problematic subgraph $S$ consists in a seeming reduction of its weight, which allows its better handling. The current best approximation algorithms for Max ATSP, achieving the approximation guarantee of $\frac 23$, are due to Kaplan, Lewenstein, Shafrir, Sviridenko (2003) and Elbassioni, Paluch, van Zuylen (2012). Using a result by Mucha, which states that an $α$-approximation algorithm for Max ATSP implies a $(2+\frac{11(1-α)}{9-2α})$-approximation algorithm for the shortest superstring problem (SSP), we obtain also a $(2 \frac{33}{76} \approx 2,434)$-approximation algorithm for SSP, beating the previously best known (having an approximation factor equal to $2 \frac{11}{23} \approx 2,4782$.)