arXiv++ Combinatorics

Statistical design of experiments is widely used in scientific and industrial investigations. A generalized minimum aberration (GMA) orthogonal array is optimum under the well-established, so-called GMA criterion, and such an array can extract as much information as possible at a fixed cost. Finding GMA arrays is an open (yet fundamental) problem in design of experiments because constructing such arrays becomes intractable as the number of runs and factors increase. We develop two directed enumeration algorithms that call the integer programming with isomorphism pruning algorithm of Margot (2007) for the purpose of finding GMA arrays. Our results include 16 GMA arrays that were not previously in the literature, along with documentation of the efficiencies that made the required calculations possible within a reasonable budget of computer time. We also validate heuristic algorithms against a GMA array catalog, by showing that they quickly output near GMA arrays, and then use the heuristics to find near GMA arrays when enumeration is computationally burdensome.

For a given linear program (LP) a permutation of its variables that sends feasible points to feasible points and preserves the objective function value of each of its feasible points is a symmetry of the LP. The set of all symmetries of an LP, denoted by $G^{\rm LP}$, is the symmetry group of the LP. Margot [F. Margot, 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958-2008 (2010), 647-686] described a method for computing a subgroup of the symmetry group $G^{\rm LP}$ of an LP. This method computes $G^{\rm LP}$ when the LP has only non-redundant inequalities and its feasible set satisfies no equality constraints. However, when the feasible set of the LP satisfies equality constraints this method finds only a subgroup of $G^{\rm LP}$ and can miss symmetries. We develop a method for finding the symmetry group of a feasible LP whose feasible set satisfies equality constraints. We apply this method to find and exploit the previously unexploited symmetries of an orthogonal array defining integer linear program (ILP) within the branch-and-bound (B\&B) with isomorphism pruning algorithm [F. Margot, Symmetric ILP: Coloring and small integers, Discrete Optimization 4 (1) (2007), 40-62]. Our method reduced the running time for finding all OD-equivalence classes of OA$(160,8,2,4)$ and OA$(176,8,2,4)$ by factors of $1/(2.16)$ and $1/(1.36)$ compared to the fastest known method [D. A. Bulutoglu and K. J. Ryan, Integer programming for classifying orthogonal arrays, Australasian Journal of Combinatorics 70 (3) (2018), 362-385]. These were the two bottleneck cases that could not have been solved until the B\&B with isomorphism pruning algorithm was applied.

Classifying orthogonal arrays is a well known important class of problems that asks for finding all non-isomorphic, non-negative integer solutions to a class of systems of constraints. Solved instances are scarce. We develop two new methods based on finding all non-isomorphic solutions of two novel integer linear programming formulations for classifying all non-isomorphic OA(N,k,s,t) given a set of all non-isomorphic OA(N,k-1,s,t). We also establish the concept of orthogonal design equivalence of OA(N,k,2,t) to reduce the number of integer linear programs (ILPs) whose all non-isomorphic solutions need to be enumerated by our methods. For each ILP, we determine the largest group of permutations that can be exploited with the branch-and-bound (B&B) with isomorphism pruning algorithm of Margot [Discrete Optim~4 (2007), 40-62] without losing isomorphism classes of OA(N,k,2,t). Our contributions brought the classifications of all non-isomorphic OA(160,k,2,4) for k=9,10 and OA(176,k,2,4) for k=5,6,7,8,9,10 within computational reach. These are the smallest s=2, t=4 cases for which classification results are not available in the literature.