arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Kimber Wolff

2 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
Grundy domination of forests and the strong product conjecture
Published in The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 28(2) (2021), #P2.12 • View PublicationBIB
A maximum sequence $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$, so that every vertex in $S$ has a neighbor which is independent, or is itself independent, from all previous vertices in $S$, is called a Grundy dominating sequence. The Grundy domination number, $γ_{gr}(G)$, is the length of $S$. We show that for any forest $F$, $γ_{gr}(F)=|V(T)|-|\mathcal{P}|$ where $\mathcal{P}$ is a minimum partition of the non-isolate vertices of $F$ into caterpillars in which if two caterpillars of $\mathcal{P}$ have an edge between them in $F$, then such an edge must be incident to a non-leaf vertex in at least one of the caterpillars. We use this result to show the strong product conjecture of B. Brešar, Cs. Bujtás, T. Gologranc, S. Klavžar, G. Košmrlj, B. Patkós, Zs. Tuza, and M. Vizer, Dominating sequences in grid-like and toroidal graphs, Electron. J. Combin. 23(4): P4.34 (2016), for all forests. Namely, we show that for any forest $G$ and graph $H$, $γ_{gr}(G \boxtimes H) = γ_{gr}(G) γ_{gr}(H)$. We also show that every connected graph $G$ has a spanning tree $T$ so that $γ_{gr}(G)\le γ_{gr}(T)$ and that every non-complete connected graph contains a Grundy dominating set $S$ so that the induced subgraph of $S$ contains no isolated vertices.
2016-08-06 v2
A new bound for Vizing's conjecture
For any graph $G$, we define the power $π(G)$ as the minimum of the largest number of neighbors in a $γ$-set of $G$, of any vertex, taken over all $γ$-sets of $G$. We show that $γ(G\square H)\geq \frac{π(G)}{2π(G) -1}γ(G)γ(H)$. Our methods allow us to prove the following statements for any graphs $G$ and $H$, (1) $γ(G\square H)\geq \frac{\lceil \frac{γ(G)}{2}\rceil}{2\lceil \frac{γ(G)}{2}\rceil-1}γ(G)γ(H)$ for odd $γ(G)$, (2) $γ(G\square H)\geq \frac{γ(G)}{2γ(G)-2}γ(G)γ(H)$, for even $γ(G)$, and (3) a short proof of Vizing's conjecture where $γ(G)=3$. Our argument relies on establishing efficient correspondences between dominating vertices and subsets of their neighborhoods and then showing a sufficient number of dominating vertices that horizontally dominate vertically undominated cells.