Papers by Konstantin Rybnikov
4 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Perfect but not generating Delaunay polytopes
In his seminal 1951 paper "Extreme forms" Coxeter \cite{cox51} observed that for $n \ge 9$ one can add vectors to the perfect lattice $\sfA_9$ so that the resulting perfect lattice, called $\sfA_9^2$ by Coxeter, has exactly the same set of minimal vectors. An inhomogeneous analog of the notion of perfect lattice is that of a lattice with a perfect Delaunay polytope: the vertices of a perfect Delaunay polytope are the analogs of minimal vectors in a perfect lattice. We find a new infinite series $P(n,s)$ for $s\geq 2$ and $n+1\geq 4s$ of $n$-dimensional perfect Delaunay polytopes. A remarkable property of this series is that for certain values of $s$ and all $n \ge 13$ one can add points to the integer affine span of $P(n,s)$ in such a way that $P(n,s)$ remains a perfect Delaunay polytope in the new lattice. Thus, we have constructed an inhomogeneous analog of the remarkable relationship between $\sfA_9$ and $\sfA_9^2$.
Supertopes
A perfect (Delaunay) ellipsoid is an ellipsoid in n-dimensional Euclidean space that does not contain integral points in its interior, but is uniquely defined by integral points that lie on its surface. A perfect Delaunay polytope with respect to a positive quadratic form f() is a polytope with integral vertices that is circumscribed by a perfect Delaunay ellipsoid with an equation whose quadratic part is f(). This document has been corrected on January 15, 2005. Note that it represents the state of the area as of the end of 2002. For recent research on perfect Delaunay polytopes see my recent preprint, with Erdahl and Ordine, math.NT/0408122 on ArXiv.org .
Criteria for Balance in Abelian Gain Graphs, with Applications to Piecewise-Linear Geometry
Published in Discrete and Computational Geometry, 34 (2005), no. 2, 251-268.
• View Publication
• BIB
A gain graph is a triple (G,h,H), where G is a connected graph with an arbitrary, but fixed, orientation of edges, H is a group, and h is a homomorphism from the free group on the edges of G to H. A gain graph is called balanced if the h-image of each closed walk on G is the identity.
Consider a gain graph with abelian gain group having no odd torsion. If there is a basis of the graph's binary cycle space each of whose members can be lifted to a closed walk whose gain is the identity, then the gain graph is balanced, provided that the graph is finite or the group has no nontrivial infinitely 2-divisible elements. We apply this theorem to deduce a result on the projective geometry of piecewise-linear realizations of cell-decompositions of manifolds.
Cycle and Circle Tests of Balance in Gain Graphs: Forbidden Minors and Their Groups
Published in J. Graph Theory, 51 (2006), no. 1, 1--21.
• View Publication
• BIB
We examine two criteria for balance of a gain graph, one based on binary cycles and one on circles. The graphs for which each criterion is valid depend on the set of allowed gain groups. The binary cycle test is invalid, except for forests, if any possible gain group has an element of odd order. Assuming all groups are allowed, or all abelian groups, or merely the cyclic group of order 3, we characterize, both constructively and by forbidden minors, the graphs for which the circle test is valid. It turns out that these three classes of groups have the same set of forbidden minors. The exact reason for the importance of the ternary cyclic group is not clear.