arXiv++ Combinatorics

Locally decodable codes (LDCs) are error correction codes that allow recovery of any single message symbol by probing only a small number of positions from the (possibly corrupted) codeword. Relaxed locally decodable codes (RLDCs) further allow the decoder to output a special failure symbol $\bot$ on a corrupted codeword. While known constructions of RLDCs achieve much better parameters than standard LDCs, it is intriguing to understand the relationship between LDCs and RLDCs. Separation results (i.e., the existence of $q$-query RLDCs that are not $q$-query LDCs) are known for $q=3$ (Gur, Minzer, Weissenberg, and Zheng, arXiv:2512.12960, 2025) and $q \geq 15$ (Grigorescu, Kumar, Manohar, and Mon, arXiv:2511.02633, 2025), while any $2$-query RLDC also gives a $2$-query LDC (Block, Blocki, Cheng, Grigorescu, Li, Zheng, and Zhu, CCC 2023). In this work, we generalize and strengthen the main result in Grigorescu, Kumar, Manohar, and Mon (arXiv:2511.02633, 2025), by removing the requirement of linear codes. Specifically, we show that any $q$-query RLDC with soundness error below some threshold $s(q)$ also yields a $q$-query LDC with comparable parameters. This holds even if the RLDC has imperfect completeness but with a non-adaptive decoder. Our results also extend to the setting of locally correctable codes (LCCs) and relaxed locally correctable codes (RLCCs). Using our results, we further derive improved lower bounds for arbitrary RLDCs and RLCCs, as well as probabilistically checkable proofs of proximity (PCPPs).

Tanner codes are graph-based linear codes whose parity-check matrices can be characterized by a bipartite graph $G$ together with a linear inner code $C_0$. Expander codes are Tanner codes whose defining bipartite graph $G$ has good expansion property. This paper is motivated by the following natural and fundamental problem in decoding expander codes: What are the sufficient and necessary conditions that $δ$ and $d_0$ must satisfy, so that \textit{every} bipartite expander $G$ with vertex expansion ratio $δ$ and \textit{every} linear inner code $C_0$ with minimum distance $d_0$ together define an expander code that corrects $Ω(n)$ errors in $O(n)$ time? For $C_0$ being the parity-check code, the landmark work of Sipser and Spielman (IEEE-TIT'96) showed that $δ>3/4$ is sufficient; later Viderman (ACM-TOCT'13) improved this to $δ>2/3-Ω(1)$ and he also showed that $δ>1/2$ is necessary. For general linear code $C_0$, the previously best-known result of Dowling and Gao (IEEE-TIT'18) showed that $d_0=Ω(cδ^{-2})$ is sufficient, where $c$ is the left-degree of $G$. In this paper, we give a near-optimal solution to the above question for general $C_0$ by showing that $δd_0>3$ is sufficient and $δd_0>1$ is necessary, thereby also significantly improving Dowling-Gao's result. We present two novel algorithms for decoding expander codes, where the first algorithm is deterministic, and the second one is randomized and has a larger decoding radius.

Random linear codes (RLCs) are well known to have nice combinatorial properties and near-optimal parameters in many different settings. However, getting explicit constructions matching the parameters of RLCs is challenging, and RLCs are hard to decode efficiently. This motivated several previous works to study the problem of partially derandomizing RLCs, by applying certain operations to an explicit mother code. Among them, one of the most well studied operations is random puncturing, where a series of works culminated in the work of Guruswami and Mosheiff (FOCS' 22), which showed that a random puncturing of a low-biased code is likely to possess almost all interesting local properties of RLCs. In this work, we provide an in-depth study of another, dual operation of random puncturing, known as random shortening, which can be viewed equivalently as random puncturing on the dual code. Our main results show that for any small $\varepsilon$, by starting from a mother code with certain weaker conditions (e.g., having a large distance) and performing a random (or even pseudorandom) shortening, the new code is $\varepsilon$-biased with high probability. Our results hold for any field size and yield a shortened code with constant rate. This can be viewed as a complement to random puncturing, and together, we can obtain codes with properties like RLCs from weaker initial conditions. Our proofs involve several non-trivial methods of estimating the weight distribution of codewords, which may be of independent interest.

We study the classical expander codes, introduced by Sipser and Spielman \cite{SS96}. Given any constants $0< α, \varepsilon < 1/2$, and an arbitrary bipartite graph with $N$ vertices on the left, $M < N$ vertices on the right, and left degree $D$ such that any left subset $S$ of size at most $αN$ has at least $(1-\varepsilon)|S|D$ neighbors, we show that the corresponding linear code given by parity checks on the right has distance at least roughly $\frac{αN}{2 \varepsilon }$. This is strictly better than the best known previous result of $2(1-\varepsilon ) αN$ \cite{Sudan2000note, Viderman13b} whenever $\varepsilon < 1/2$, and improves the previous result significantly when $\varepsilon $ is small. Furthermore, we show that this distance is tight in general, thus providing a complete characterization of the distance of general expander codes. Next, we provide several efficient decoding algorithms, which vastly improve previous results in terms of the fraction of errors corrected, whenever $\varepsilon < \frac{1}{4}$. Finally, we also give a bound on the list-decoding radius of general expander codes, which beats the classical Johnson bound in certain situations (e.g., when the graph is almost regular and the code has a high rate). Our techniques exploit novel combinatorial properties of bipartite expander graphs. In particular, we establish a new size-expansion tradeoff, which may be of independent interests.

This paper studies \emph{linear} and \emph{affine} error-correcting codes for correcting synchronization errors such as insertions and deletions. We call such codes linear/affine insdel codes. Linear codes that can correct even a single deletion are limited to have information rate at most $1/2$ (achieved by the trivial 2-fold repetition code). Previously, it was (erroneously) reported that more generally no non-trivial linear codes correcting $k$ deletions exist, i.e., that the $(k+1)$-fold repetition codes and its rate of $1/(k+1)$ are basically optimal for any $k$. We disprove this and show the existence of binary linear codes of length $n$ and rate just below $1/2$ capable of correcting $Ω(n)$ insertions and deletions. This identifies rate $1/2$ as a sharp threshold for recovery from deletions for linear codes, and reopens the quest for a better understanding of the capabilities of linear codes for correcting insertions/deletions. We prove novel outer bounds and existential inner bounds for the rate vs. (edit) distance trade-off of linear insdel codes. We complement our existential results with an efficient synchronization-string-based transformation that converts any asymptotically-good linear code for Hamming errors into an asymptotically-good linear code for insdel errors. Lastly, we show that the $\frac{1}{2}$-rate limitation does not hold for affine codes by giving an explicit affine code of rate $1-ε$ which can efficiently correct a constant fraction of insdel errors.