Papers by Logan R. Chalmers
3 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Equilateral sets in $\ell_p^n$ beyond $n+1$: Linear excess and dimension cost
How many equilateral points can $\ell_p^n$ contain beyond $n+1$? For every fixed real $p>4$, we construct equilateral sets for which the number of points beyond $n+1$ grows at least linearly with $n$. For every fixed dimension, we prove that the maximum is $n+1$ at all sufficiently large finite $p$, with an explicit threshold. The least dimension admitting any fixed number of extra points is $p^{1+o(1)}$ as $p\to\infty$. The constructions and finite bounds are formalised in Lean. Thus $p=4$ marks the boundary: $n+1$ is exact in every dimension for $2\leq p\leq4$, while at every fixed finite $p>4$ the excess grows at least linearly with dimension.
A 32-leaf tree requiring six coordinates for an isometric $\ell_\infty$ embedding
We disprove the conjecture that every tree with t leaves embeds isometrically into $\ell_\infty^{\lceil \log_2 t\rceil}$. We construct a 32-leaf tree whose least isometric $\ell_\infty$-dimension is six rather than five, and prove that every tree with at most 31 leaves attains the conjectured bound; Brigham et al. had recorded equality through 21 leaves. Thus 32 is the first failure, and the example answers affirmatively a question of Fitzpatrick and Nowakowski from 2000. The same topology has dimension six under every assignment of positive edge lengths, and therefore also disproves the later sharp leaf-threshold conjecture for weighted metric trees.
A counterexample to Kusner's conjecture on equilateral sets
We disprove Kusner's 1983 conjecture that every equilateral set in $\ell_p^n$ with $2<p<\infty$ has at most $n+1$ points: there exist $58$ points in $\mathbb{R}^{56}$ whose pairwise $\ell_5$ distances are all equal, so the maximum equilateral-set size satisfies $e(\ell_5^{56})\ge58>57$. This is the first equilateral set of more than $n+1$ points in $\ell_p^n$ for any finite $p\ge2$. The construction persists on an open interval of exponents around $5$; since Ge, Xu and Zhou recently proved the conjecture for $2\le p\le4$, the infimum of exponents at which it fails lies in $[4,5)$. The configuration is the unique solution of an explicit polynomial system with rational coefficients in a rational box, established in exact arithmetic.