arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the average height of random trees generated by leaf-centric binary tree sources as introduced by Zhang, Yang and Kieffer. A leaf-centric binary tree source induces for every $n \geq 2$ a probability distribution on the set of binary trees with $n$ leaves. Our results generalize a result by Devroye, according to which the average height of a random binary search tree of size $n$ is in $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$.

A fringe subtree of a rooted tree is a subtree induced by one of the vertices and all its descendants. We consider the problem of estimating the number of distinct fringe subtrees in two types of random trees: simply generated trees and families of increasing trees (recursive trees, $d$-ary increasing trees and generalized plane-oriented recursive trees). We prove that the order of magnitude of the number of distinct fringe subtrees (under rather mild assumptions on what `distinct' means) in random trees with $n$ vertices is $n/\sqrt{\log n}$ for simply generated trees and $n/\log n$ for increasing trees.

Whereas for strings, higher-order empirical entropy is the standard entropy measure, several different notions of empirical entropy for trees have been proposed in the past, notably label entropy, degree entropy, conditional versions of the latter two, and empirical entropy of trees (here, called label-shape entropy). In this paper, we carry out a systematic comparison of these entropy measures. We underpin our theoretical investigations by experimental results with real XML data.

A fringe subtree of a rooted tree is a subtree consisting of one of the nodes and all its descendants. In this paper, we are specifically interested in the number of non-isomorphic trees that appear in the collection of all fringe subtrees of a binary tree. This number is analysed under two different random models: uniformly random binary trees and random binary search trees. In the case of uniformly random binary trees, we show that the number of non-isomorphic fringe subtrees lies between $c_1n/\sqrt{\ln n}(1+o(1))$ and $c_2n/\sqrt{\ln n}(1+o(1))$ for two constants $c_1 \approx 1.0591261434$ and $c_2 \approx 1.0761505454$, both in expectation and with high probability, where $n$ denotes the size (number of leaves) of the uniformly random binary tree. A similar result is proven for random binary search trees, but the order of magnitude is $n/\ln n$ in this case. Our proof technique can also be used to strengthen known results on the number of distinct fringe subtrees (distinct in the sense of ordered trees). This quantity is of the same order of magnitude in both cases, but with slightly different constants in the upper and lower bounds.

We study the average number of distinct fringe subtrees in random trees generated by leaf-centric binary tree sources as introduced by Zhang, Yang and Kieffer. A leaf-centric binary tree source induces for every $n \geq 2$ a probability distribution on the set of binary trees with $n$ leaves. We generalize a result by Flajolet, Gourdon, Martinez and Devroye, according to which the average number of distinct fringe subtrees in a random binary search tree of size $n$ is in $Θ(n/\log n)$, as well as a result by Flajolet, Sipala and Steayert, according to which the number of distinct fringe subtrees in a uniformly random binary tree of size $n$ is in $Θ(n/\sqrt{\log n})$.