arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given two structures $\mathcal{M}$ and $\mathcal{N}$ on the same domain, we say that $\mathcal{N}$ is a reduct of $\mathcal{M}$ if all $\emptyset$-definable relations of $\mathcal{N}$ are $\emptyset$-definable in $\mathcal{M}$. In this article the reducts of the Henson digraphs are classified. Henson digraphs are homogeneous countable digraphs that omit some set of finite tournaments. As the Henson digraphs are $\aleph_0$-categorical, determining their reducts is equivalent to determining all closed supergroups $G<$ Sym$(\mathbb{N})$ of their automorphism groups. A consequence of the classification is that there are $2^{\aleph_0}$ pairwise non-isomorphic Henson digraphs which have no proper non-trivial reducts. Taking their automorphisms groups gives a positive answer to a question of Macpherson that asked if there are $2^{\aleph_0}$ pairwise non-conjugate maximal-closed subgroups of Sym$(\mathbb{N})$. By the reconstruction results of Rubin, these groups are also non-isomorphic as abstract groups.

The generic digraph $(D,E)$ is the unique countable homogeneous digraph that embeds all finite digraphs. In this paper, we determine the lattice of reducts of $(D,E)$, where a structure $\mathcal{M}$ is a reduct of $(D,E)$ if it has domain $D$ and all its $\emptyset$-definable relations are $\emptyset$-definable relations of $(D,E)$. As $(D,E)$ is $\aleph_0$-categorical, this is equivalent to determining the lattice of closed groups that lie in between Aut$(D,E)$ and Sym$(D)$.